Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maja Stahl

dblp:331/4457 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-5982-726XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 87% Information extraction and text analysis · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › controllable text generation
text editing
1.012026
Teaching LLMs Human-Like Editing of Inappropriate Argumentation via Reinforcement Learning · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
text rewriting
1.012026
Teaching LLMs Human-Like Editing of Inappropriate Argumentation via Reinforcement Learning · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › argument mining
argument quality assessment
0.312026
Teaching LLMs Human-Like Editing of Inappropriate Argumentation via Reinforcement Learning · ACL (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 1.0group relative policy optimization · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Teaching LLMs Human-Like Editing of Inappropriate Argumentation via Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Editing human-written text has become a standard use case of large language models (LLMs), for example, to make one's arguments more appropriate for a discussion.Comparing human to LLM-generated edits, however, we observe a mismatch in editing strategies: While LLMs often perform multiple scattered edits and tend to change meaning notably, humans rather encapsulate dependent changes in selfcontained, meaning-preserving edits.In this paper, we present a reinforcement learning approach that teaches LLMs human-like editing to improve the appropriateness of arguments.Our approach produces self-contained sentence-level edit suggestions that can be accepted or rejected independently.We train the approach using group relative policy optimization with a multi-component reward function that jointly optimizes edit-level semantic similarity, fluency, and pattern conformity as well as argument-level appropriateness.In automatic and human evaluation, it outperforms competitive baselines and the state of the art in humanlike editing, with multi-round editing achieving appropriateness close to full rewriting.
Timon Ziegenbein, Maja Stahl, Henning Wachsmuth
ACL (1)2
2024 Reference-guided Style-Consistent Content Transfer
abstract
In this paper, we introduce the task of style-consistent content transfer, which concerns modifying a text’s content based on a provided reference statement while preserving its original style. We approach the task by employing multi-task learning to ensure that the modified text meets three important conditions: reference faithfulness, style adherence, and coherence. In particular, we train three independent classifiers for each condition. During inference, these classifiers are used to determine the best modified text variant. Our evaluation, conducted on hotel reviews and news articles, compares our approach with sequence-to-sequence and error correction baselines. The results demonstrate that our approach reasonably generates text satisfying all three conditions. In subsequent analyses, we highlight the strengths and limitations of our approach, providing valuable insights for future research directions.
Wei-Fan Chen 0001, Milad Alshomary, Maja Stahl, Khalid Al-Khatib, Benno Stein 0001, Henning Wachsmuth
LREC/COLING3
2024 A School Student Essay Corpus for Analyzing Interactions of Argumentative Structure and Quality
abstract
Maja Stahl, Nadine Michel, Sebastian Kilsbach, Julian Schmidtke, Sara Rezat, Henning Wachsmuth. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Maja Stahl, Nadine Michel, Sebastian Kilsbach, Julian Schmidtke, Sara Rezat, Henning Wachsmuth
NAACL-HLT1