VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shreyas Pimpalgaonkar
dblp:331/4780
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 62% Trustworthy machine learning · 38% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Transformers Struggle to Learn to Search · ICLR 2025 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph connectivity |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Transformers Struggle to Learn to Search · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Transformers Struggle to Learn to Search · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
mechanistic interpretability |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Transformers Struggle to Learn to Search · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mechanistic interpretability · 1.7chain-of-thought · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Transformers Struggle to Learn to SearchabstractSearch is an ability foundational in many important tasks, and recent studies have shown that large language models (LLMs) struggle to perform search robustly. It is unknown whether this inability is due to a lack of data, insufficient model parameters, or fundamental limitations of the transformer architecture. In this work, we use the foundational graph connectivity problem as a testbed to generate effectively limitless high-coverage data to train small transformers and test whether they can learn to perform search. We find that, when given the right training distribution, the transformer is able to learn to search.
We analyze the algorithm that the transformer has learned through a novel mechanistic interpretability technique that enables us to extract the computation graph from the trained model. We find that for each vertex in the input graph, transformers compute the set of vertices reachable from that vertex. Each layer then progressively expands these sets, allowing the model to search over a number of vertices exponential in the number of layers.
However, we find that as the input graph size increases, the transformer has greater difficulty in learning the task. This difficulty is not resolved even as the number of parameters is increased, suggesting that increasing model scale will not lead to robust search abilities. We also find that performing search in-context (i.e., chain-of-thought) does not resolve this inability to learn to search on larger graphs. Abulhair Saparov, Srushti Pawar, Shreyas Pimpalgaonkar, Nitish Joshi, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Vishakh Padmakumar, Mehran Kazemi, Najoung Kim, He He 0001 |
ICLR | 3 |