VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shenglong Yao
dblp:331/5986
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 44% Network security · 22% Security and privacy of machine learning · 17% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 44% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 44% Efficient and distributed learning · 13% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 50% Program analysis · 50% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
agent models |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Behavior Knowledge Merge in Reinforced Agentic Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Behavior Knowledge Merge in Reinforced Agentic Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Network security › anonymity networks
metadata-private messaging |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Scaling Metadata-Private Messaging Under Hardware Trust · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure multiparty computation › oblivious computation
oblivious algorithms |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Scaling Metadata-Private Messaging Under Hardware Trust · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure multiparty computation › oblivious computation
oblivious shuffle |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Scaling Metadata-Private Messaging Under Hardware Trust · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026 |
Program analysis
constraint solving |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Hybrid Language Processor Fuzzing via LLM-Based Constraint Solving · USENIX Security Symposium 2025 |
Software testing
fuzzing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Hybrid Language Processor Fuzzing via LLM-Based Constraint Solving · USENIX Security Symposium 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
machine unlearning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Proof of Unlearning: Definitions and Instantiation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024 |
Hardware security and side channels
trusted execution environments |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Proof of Unlearning: Definitions and Instantiation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model merging |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Behavior Knowledge Merge in Reinforced Agentic Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning and data management › machine learning systems
machine learning as a service |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Proof of Unlearning: Definitions and Instantiation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
secure enclaves · 2.0oblivious algorithms · 2.0authenticated data structure · 1.5SGX enclave · 1.5reinforcement learning · 1.0behavior knowledge merge · 1.0large language model · 0.9constraint solving · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Behavior Knowledge Merge in Reinforced Agentic ModelsabstractXiangchi Yuan, Dachuan Shi, Chunhui Zhang, Zheyuan Liu, Shenglong Yao, Soroush Vosoughi, Wenke Lee. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Xiangchi Yuan, Dachuan Shi, Zheyuan Liu 0010, Shenglong Yao, Soroush Vosoughi, Wenke Lee |
ACL (1) | 5 |
| 2026 | Scaling Metadata-Private Messaging Under Hardware TrustabstractIn end-to-end encrypted (E2EE) messaging systems, protecting communication metadata, such as who is communicating with whom, at what time, etc., remains a challenging problem. Existing designs mostly fall into the balancing act among security, performance, and trust assumptions: 1) designs with cryptographic security often use hefty operations, incurring performance roadblocks and expensive operational costs for large-scale deployment; 2) more performant systems often follow a weaker security guarantee, like differential privacy, and generally demand more trust from the involved servers. So far, there has been no dominant solution. In this paper, we take a different technical route from prior art, and propose Boomerang, an alternative metadata-private messaging system leveraging the readily available trust assumption on secure enclaves (as those emerging in the cloud). Through a number of carefully tailored oblivious techniques on message shuffling, workload distribution, and proactive patching of the communication pattern, Boomerang brings together low latency, horizontal scalability, and cryptographic security, without prohibitive extra cost. With 32 machines, Boomerang achieves 99th percentile latency of 7.76 seconds for$2^{20}$clients. Upon Boomerang, we also propose and implement a new client instantiation based on modern web browser extensions. We hope Boomerang offers attractive alternative options to the current landscape of metadata-private messaging designs. Peipei Jiang 0002, Jianhao Cheng, Lei Xu 0019, Shenglong Yao, Qian Wang 0002, Cong Wang 0001, Kui Ren 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Netw. | 5 |
| 2025 | Hybrid Language Processor Fuzzing via LLM-Based Constraint Solving
Yupeng Yang, Shenglong Yao, Jizhou Chen, Wenke Lee |
USENIX Security Symposium | 2 |
| 2024 | Proof of Unlearning: Definitions and InstantiationabstractThe “Right to be Forgotten” rule in machine learning (ML) practice enables some individual data to be deleted from a trained model, as pursued by recently developed machine unlearning techniques. To truly comply with the rule, a natural and necessary step is to verify if the individual data are indeed deleted after unlearning. Yet, previousparameter-spaceverification metrics may be easily evaded by a distrustful model trainer. Thus, Thudiet al. recently present a call to action onalgorithm-levelverification in USENIX Security’22. We respond to the call, by reconsidering the unlearning problem in the scenario of machine learning as a service (MLaaS), and proposing a new definition framework forProof of Unlearning(PoUL) on algorithm level. Specifically, our PoUL definitions (i) enforce correctness properties on both the pre and post phases of unlearning, so as to prevent the state-of-the-art forging attacks; (ii) highlight proper practicality requirements of both the prover and verifier sides with minimal invasiveness to the off-the-shelf service pipeline and computational workloads. Under the definition framework, we subsequently present a trusted hardware-empowered instantiation using SGX enclave, by logically incorporating an authentication layer for tracing the data lineage with a proving layer for supporting the audit of learning. We customize authenticated data structures to support large out-of-enclave storage with simple operation logic, and meanwhile, enable proving complex unlearning logic with affordable memory footprints in the enclave. We finally validate the feasibility of the proposed instantiation with a proof-of-concept implementation and multi-dimensional performance evaluation. Jia-Si Weng 0001, Shenglong Yao, Yuefeng Du 0001, Jian Weng 0001, Cong Wang 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 2 |