Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chuyan Ge
dblp:331/7492
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0008-6604-1717ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design
requirements traceability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Cross-Level Requirements Tracing Based on Large Language Models · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prompt tuning · 0.9p-tuning · 0.9large language model · 0.9data augmentation · 0.9LoRA · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Cross-Level Requirements Tracing Based on Large Language ModelsabstractCross-level requirements traceability, linkinghigh-level requirements(HLRs) andlow-level requirements(LLRs), is essential for maintaining relationships and consistency in software development. However, the manual creation of requirements links necessitates a profound understanding of the project and entails a complex and laborious process. Existing machine learning and deep learning methods often fail to fully understand semantic information, leading to low accuracy and unstable performance. This paper presents the first approach for cross-level requirements tracing based on large language models (LLMs) and introduces a data augmentation strategy (such as synonym replacement, machine translation, and noise introduction) to enhance model robustness. We compare three fine-tuning strategies—LoRA, P-Tuning, and Prompt-Tuning—on different scales of LLaMA models (1.1B, 7B, and 13B). The fine-tuned LLMs exhibit superior performance across various datasets, including six single-project datasets, three cross-project datasets within the same domain, and one cross-domain dataset. Experimental results show that fine-tuned LLMs outperform traditional information retrieval, machine learning, and deep learning methods on various datasets. Furthermore, we compare the performance of GPT and DeepSeek LLMs under different prompt templates, revealing their high sensitivity to prompt design and relatively poor result stability. Our approach achieves superior performance, outperforming GPT-4o and DeepSeek-r1 by 16.27% and 16.8% in F1 score on cross-domain datasets. Compared to the baseline method that relies on prompt engineering, it achieves a maximum improvement of 13.8%. Chuyan Ge, Tiantian Wang 0001, Christoph Treude |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 1 |
| 2024 | Code smell detection based on supervised learning models: A survey
Yang Zhang 0037, Chuyan Ge |
Neurocomputing | 2 |
| 2022 | DeleSmell: Code smell detection based on deep learning and latent semantic analysis
Yang Zhang 0037, Chuyan Ge, Shuai Hong, Ruili Tian, Chunhao Dong |
Knowl. Based Syst. | 2 |