Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Max Merlin

dblp:331/8054 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-4894-6836ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 87% Motion planning and robot control · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
partially observable planning
0.812024
Robot Task Planning Under Local Observability · ICRA 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
task planning
0.812024
Robot Task Planning Under Local Observability · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
mobile robot task execution
0.212024
Robot Task Planning Under Local Observability · ICRA 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

off-the-shelf markov planners · 0.8markov decision process · 0.8POMDP · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Least Commitment Planning for the Object Scouting Problem
abstract
State uncertainty is a primary obstacle to effective long-horizon robot task planning. State uncertainty can be decomposed into spatial uncertainty—resolved using SLAM—and uncertainty about the objects in the environment, formalized as the object scouting problem and modeled using the Locally Observable Markov Decision Process (LOMDP). We introduce a new planning framework specifically designed for object scouting with LOMDPs called the Scouting Partial-Order Planner (SPOP), which exploits the characteristics of partial order and regression planning to plan around knowledge gaps the robot may have about the existence, location, and state of relevant objects in its environment. Our results highlight the benefits of partial-order planning, demonstrating its suitability for object scouting due to its ability to identify absent but task-relevant objects, and show that it outperforms comparable planners in plan length, computation time, and execution time.
Max Merlin, George Dimitri Konidaris, David Paulius
IROS1
2024 Robot Task Planning Under Local Observability
abstract
Real-world robot task planning is intractable in part due to partial observability. A common approach to reducing complexity is introducing additional structure into the decision process, such as mixed-observability, factored states, or temporally-extended actions. We propose the locally observable Markov decision process, a novel formulation that models task-level planning where uncertainty pertains to object-level attributes and where a robot has subroutines for seeking and accurately observing objects. This models sensors that are range-limited and line-of-sight—objects occluded or outside sensor range are unobserved, but the attributes of objects that fall within sensor view can be resolved via repeated observation. Our model results in a three-stage planning process: first, the robot plans using only observed objects; if that fails, it generates a target object that, if observed, could result in a feasible plan; finally, it attempts to locate and observe the target, replanning after each newly observed object. By combining LOMDPs with off-the-shelf Markov planners, we outperform state-of-the-art-solvers for both object-oriented POMDP and MDP analogues with the same task specification. We then apply the formulation to successfully solve a task on a mobile robot.
Max Merlin, Shane Parr, Neev Parikh, Sergio Orozco, Vedant Gupta, Eric Rosen, George Dimitri Konidaris
ICRA1