Accurate path tracking is one of the main challenges autonomous vehicles have to deal with. It is known that, when dealing with real hardware systems, the presence of parametric uncertainty and unmodelled aspects of the system dynamics affects all model-based control approaches, hindering their nominal performance guarantees. To compensate for this issue, data-driven schemes have drawn significant attention from the scientific community thanks to their inherent ability to learn from experience, thus automatically compensate for system uncertainties and time-varying behaviours. This work aims to develop a reinforcement learning-based longitudinal and lateral dynamics control introducing mismatch and motion penalization metrics, validating the resulting controller in a simulated Formula SAE skid-test scenario employing the Sapienza Fast Charge Formula SAE Electric Racing Team dynamical model.

Autonomous driving has emerged as a technology to revolutionize the future of transportation and completely re-define the landscape of road systems. Accurate control algorithms are crucial to ensure the safety and efficiency of autonomous vehicles; in particular, incorporating actuator dynamics into the vehicle dynamics model can improve the response of the system to control commands, with clear safety implications. This work proposes pulse width modulation-based control strategies for the steering and brake actuators of a Formula SAE driverless vehicle. Extensive simulation tests and real-world experiments on a Formula SAE skid-test scenario validate the proposed approach.

Recent object detection models for infrared (IR) imagery are based upon deep neural networks (DNNs) and require large amounts of labeled training imagery. However, publicly available datasets that can be used for such training are limited in their size and diversity. To address this problem, we explore cross-modal style transfer (CMST) to leverage large and diverse color imagery datasets so that they can be used to train DNN-based IR image-based object detectors. We evaluate six contemporary stylization methods on four publicly-available IR datasets - the first comparison of its kind - and find that CMST is highly effective for DNN-based detectors. Surprisingly, we find that existing data-driven methods are outperformed by a simple grayscale stylization (an average of the color channels). Our analysis reveals that existing data-driven methods are either too simplistic or introduce significant artifacts into the imagery. To overcome these limitations, we propose meta-learning style transfer (MLST), which learns a stylization by composing and tuning well-behaved analytic functions. We find that MLST leads to more complex stylizations without introducing significant image artifacts and achieves the best overall detector performance on our benchmark datasets.

Recently, the first foundation model developed specifically for image segmentation tasks was developed, termed the "Segment Anything Model" (SAM). SAM can segment objects in input imagery based on cheap input prompts, such as one (or more) points, a bounding box, or a mask. The authors examined the zero-shot image segmentation accuracy of SAM on a large number of vision benchmark tasks and found that SAM usually achieved recognition accuracy similar to, or sometimes exceeding, vision models that had been trained on the target tasks. The impressive generalization of SAM for segmentation has major implications for vision researchers working on natural imagery. In this work, we examine whether SAM’s performance extends to overhead imagery problems and help guide the community’s response to its development. We examine SAM’s performance on a set of diverse and widely studied benchmark tasks. We find that SAM does often generalize well to overhead imagery, although it fails in some cases due to the unique characteristics of overhead imagery and its common target objects. We report on these unique systematic failure cases for remote sensing imagery that may comprise useful future research for the community.

There is evidence that transformers offer state-of-the-art recognition performance on tasks involving overhead imagery (e.g., satellite imagery). However, it is difficult to make unbiased empirical comparisons between competing deep learning models, making it unclear whether, and to what extent, transformer-based models are beneficial. In this paper we systematically compare the impact of adding transformer structures into state-of-the-art segmentation models for overhead imagery. Each model is given a similar budget of free parameters, and their hyperparameters are optimized using Bayesian Optimization with a fixed quantity of data and computation time. We conduct our experiments with a large and diverse dataset comprising two large public benchmarks: Inria and DeepGlobe. We perform additional ablation studies to explore the impact of specific transformer-based modeling choices. Our results suggest that transformers provide consistent, but modest, performance improvements. We only observe this advantage however in hybrid models that combine convolutional and transformer-based structures, while fully transformer-based models achieve relatively poor performance.