Carter Fang

dblp:332/0321 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-7427-7358ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
3D vision · 50% Video understanding and tracking · 32% Robot navigation and mapping · 18%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
feature tracking
1.522025
Data-Driven Feature Tracking for Event Cameras With and Without Frames · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025
Data-Driven Feature Tracking for Event Cameras · CVPR 2023
Computer vision › 3D vision › event-based vision
event-based feature tracking
0.912025
Data-Driven Feature Tracking for Event Cameras With and Without Frames · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision
event-based vision
0.912025
Data-Driven Feature Tracking for Event Cameras With and Without Frames · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
visual odometry and SLAM
0.912025
Data-Driven Feature Tracking for Event Cameras With and Without Frames · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hybrid event-frame tracking · 0.9frame attention module · 0.9data-driven tracking · 0.9zero-shot transfer · 0.7self-supervision · 0.7frame attention · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Data-Driven Feature Tracking for Event Cameras With and Without Frames
abstract
Because of their high temporal resolution, increased resilience to motion blur, and very sparse output, event cameras have been shown to be ideal for low-latency and low-bandwidth feature tracking, even in challenging scenarios. Existing feature tracking methods for event cameras are either handcrafted or derived from first principles but require extensive parameter tuning, are sensitive to noise, and do not generalize to different scenarios due to unmodeled effects. To tackle these deficiencies, we introduce the first data-driven feature tracker for event cameras, which leverages low-latency events to track features detected in an intensity frame. We achieve robust performance via a novel frame attention module, which shares information across feature tracks. Our tracker is designed to operate in two distinct configurations: solely with events or in a hybrid mode incorporating both events and frames. The hybrid model offers two setups: an aligned configuration where the event and frame cameras share the same viewpoint, and a hybrid stereo configuration where the event camera and the standard camera are positioned side-by-side. This side-by-side arrangement is particularly valuable as it provides depth information for each feature track, enhancing its utility in applications such as visual odometry and simultaneous localization and mapping.
Nico Messikommer, Carter Fang, Mathias Gehrig, Giovanni Cioffi, Davide Scaramuzza 0001
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
2023 Data-Driven Feature Tracking for Event Cameras
abstract
Because of their high temporal resolution, increased resilience to motion blur, and very sparse output, event cameras have been shown to be ideal for low-latency and low-bandwidth feature tracking, even in challenging scenarios. Existing feature tracking methods for event cameras are either handcrafted or derived from first principles but require extensive parameter tuning, are sensitive to noise, and do not generalize to different scenarios due to unmodeled effects. To tackle these deficiencies, we introduce the first data-driven feature tracker for event cameras, which leverages low-latency events to track features detected in a grayscale frame. We achieve robust performance via a novel frame attention module, which shares information across feature tracks. By directly transferring zero-shot from synthetic to real data, our data-driven tracker outperforms existing approaches in relative feature age by up to 120 % while also achieving the lowest latency. This performance gap is further increased to 130 % by adapting our tracker to real data with a novel self-supervision strategy. Multimedia Material A video is available at https://youtu.be/dtkXvNXcWRY and code at https://github.com/uzh-rpg/deep_ev_tracker
Nico Messikommer, Carter Fang, Mathias Gehrig, Davide Scaramuzza 0001
CVPR2
2022 HiddenGems: Efficient safety boundary detection with active learning
abstract
Evaluating safety performance in a resource-efficient way is crucial for the development of autonomous systems. Simulation of parameterized scenarios is a popular testing strategy but parameter sweeps can be prohibitively expensive. To address this, we propose HiddenGems: a sample-efficient method for discovering the boundary between compliant and non-compliant behavior via active learning. Given a parameterized scenario, one or more compliance metrics, and a simulation oracle, HiddenGems maps the compliant and noncompliant domains of the scenario. The methodology enables critical test case identification, comparative analysis of different versions of the system under test, as well as verification of design objectives. We evaluate HiddenGems on a scenario with a jaywalker crossing in front of an autonomous vehicle and obtain compliance boundary estimates for collision, lane keep, and acceleration metrics individually and in combination, with 6 times fewer simulations than a parameter sweep. We also show how HiddenGems can be used to detect and rectify a failure mode for an unprotected turn with 86% fewer simulations.
Aleksandar Petrov, Carter Fang, Khang Minh Pham, You Hong Eng, James Guo Ming Fu, Scott Pendleton
IROS2