VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Carter Fang
dblp:332/0321
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-7427-7358ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
3D vision · 50% Video understanding and tracking · 32% Robot navigation and mapping · 18% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
feature tracking |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Data-Driven Feature Tracking for Event Cameras With and Without Frames · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 Data-Driven Feature Tracking for Event Cameras · CVPR 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › event-based vision
event-based feature tracking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Data-Driven Feature Tracking for Event Cameras With and Without Frames · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
event-based vision |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Data-Driven Feature Tracking for Event Cameras With and Without Frames · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
visual odometry and SLAM |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Data-Driven Feature Tracking for Event Cameras With and Without Frames · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hybrid event-frame tracking · 0.9frame attention module · 0.9data-driven tracking · 0.9zero-shot transfer · 0.7self-supervision · 0.7frame attention · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Data-Driven Feature Tracking for Event Cameras With and Without FramesabstractBecause of their high temporal resolution, increased resilience to motion blur, and very sparse output, event cameras have been shown to be ideal for low-latency and low-bandwidth feature tracking, even in challenging scenarios. Existing feature tracking methods for event cameras are either handcrafted or derived from first principles but require extensive parameter tuning, are sensitive to noise, and do not generalize to different scenarios due to unmodeled effects. To tackle these deficiencies, we introduce the first data-driven feature tracker for event cameras, which leverages low-latency events to track features detected in an intensity frame. We achieve robust performance via a novel frame attention module, which shares information across feature tracks. Our tracker is designed to operate in two distinct configurations: solely with events or in a hybrid mode incorporating both events and frames. The hybrid model offers two setups: an aligned configuration where the event and frame cameras share the same viewpoint, and a hybrid stereo configuration where the event camera and the standard camera are positioned side-by-side. This side-by-side arrangement is particularly valuable as it provides depth information for each feature track, enhancing its utility in applications such as visual odometry and simultaneous localization and mapping. Nico Messikommer, Carter Fang, Mathias Gehrig, Giovanni Cioffi, Davide Scaramuzza 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2023 | Data-Driven Feature Tracking for Event CamerasabstractBecause of their high temporal resolution, increased resilience to motion blur, and very sparse output, event cameras have been shown to be ideal for low-latency and low-bandwidth feature tracking, even in challenging scenarios. Existing feature tracking methods for event cameras are either handcrafted or derived from first principles but require extensive parameter tuning, are sensitive to noise, and do not generalize to different scenarios due to unmodeled effects. To tackle these deficiencies, we introduce the first data-driven feature tracker for event cameras, which leverages low-latency events to track features detected in a grayscale frame. We achieve robust performance via a novel frame attention module, which shares information across feature tracks. By directly transferring zero-shot from synthetic to real data, our data-driven tracker outperforms existing approaches in relative feature age by up to 120 % while also achieving the lowest latency. This performance gap is further increased to 130 % by adapting our tracker to real data with a novel self-supervision strategy. Multimedia Material A video is available at https://youtu.be/dtkXvNXcWRY and code at https://github.com/uzh-rpg/deep_ev_tracker Nico Messikommer, Carter Fang, Mathias Gehrig, Davide Scaramuzza 0001 |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2022 | HiddenGems: Efficient safety boundary detection with active learningabstractEvaluating safety performance in a resource-efficient way is crucial for the development of autonomous systems. Simulation of parameterized scenarios is a popular testing strategy but parameter sweeps can be prohibitively expensive. To address this, we propose HiddenGems: a sample-efficient method for discovering the boundary between compliant and non-compliant behavior via active learning. Given a parameterized scenario, one or more compliance metrics, and a simulation oracle, HiddenGems maps the compliant and noncompliant domains of the scenario. The methodology enables critical test case identification, comparative analysis of different versions of the system under test, as well as verification of design objectives. We evaluate HiddenGems on a scenario with a jaywalker crossing in front of an autonomous vehicle and obtain compliance boundary estimates for collision, lane keep, and acceleration metrics individually and in combination, with 6 times fewer simulations than a parameter sweep. We also show how HiddenGems can be used to detect and rectify a failure mode for an unprotected turn with 86% fewer simulations. Aleksandar Petrov, Carter Fang, Khang Minh Pham, You Hong Eng, James Guo Ming Fu, Scott Pendleton |
IROS | 2 |