Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Till Richter

dblp:332/0767 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 60% Deep learning architectures and training · 20% Robot manipulation · 20%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
conditional generation
0.912025
Multi-Modal and Multi-Attribute Generation of Single Cells with CFGen · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching
0.912025
Multi-Modal and Multi-Attribute Generation of Single Cells with CFGen · ICLR 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis › single-cell RNA sequencing
single-cell RNA-seq analysis
0.912025
Multi-Modal and Multi-Attribute Generation of Single Cells with CFGen · ICLR 2025
Robotics › Robot manipulation › parameter identification
dynamics identification
0.612022
Sparsity in Continuous-Depth Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural differential equations
neural ordinary differential equations
0.612022
Sparsity in Continuous-Depth Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

flow matching · 1.7weight sparsity · 0.6regularization · 0.6feature sparsity · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Multi-Modal and Multi-Attribute Generation of Single Cells with CFGen
abstract
Generative modeling of single-cell RNA-seq data is crucial for tasks like trajectory inference, batch effect removal, and simulation of realistic cellular data. However, recent deep generative models simulating synthetic single cells from noise operate on pre-processed continuous gene expression approximations, overlooking the discrete nature of single-cell data, which limits their effectiveness and hinders the incorporation of robust noise models. Additionally, aspects like controllable multi-modal and multi-label generation of cellular data remain underexplored. This work introduces CellFlow for Generation (CFGen), a flow-based conditional generative model that preserves the inherent discreteness of single-cell data. CFGen reliably generates whole-genome, multi-modal, single-cell data, improving the recovery of crucial biological data characteristics while tackling relevant generative tasks such as rare cell type augmentation and batch correction. We also introduce a novel framework for compositional data generation using Flow Matching. By showcasing CFGen on a diverse set of biological datasets and settings, we provide evidence of its value to the fields of computational biology and deep generative models.
Alessandro Palma, Till Richter, Hanyi Zhang, Manuel Lubetzki, Alexander Tong 0001, Andrea Dittadi, Fabian J. Theis
ICLR2
2022 Sparsity in Continuous-Depth Neural Networks
abstract
Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (NODEs) have proven successful in learning dynamical systems in terms of accurately recovering the observed trajectories. While different types of sparsity have been proposed to improve robustness, the generalization properties of NODEs for dynamical systems beyond the observed data are underexplored. We systematically study the influence of weight and feature sparsity on forecasting as well as on identifying the underlying dynamical laws. Besides assessing existing methods, we propose a regularization technique to sparsify ``input-output connections'' and extract relevant features during training. Moreover, we curate real-world datasets including human motion capture and human hematopoiesis single-cell RNA-seq data to realistically analyze different levels of out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization in forecasting and dynamics identification respectively. Our extensive empirical evaluation on these challenging benchmarks suggests that weight sparsity improves generalization in the presence of noise or irregular sampling. However, it does not prevent learning spurious feature dependencies in the inferred dynamics, rendering them impractical for predictions under interventions, or for inferring the true underlying dynamics. Instead, feature sparsity can indeed help with recovering sparse ground-truth dynamics compared to unregularized NODEs.
Hananeh Aliee, Till Richter, Mikhail Solonin, Ignacio Ibarra, Fabian J. Theis, Niki Kilbertus
NeurIPS2