Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ignacio Ibarra
dblp:332/1143
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 50% Robot manipulation · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot manipulation › parameter identification
dynamics identification |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Sparsity in Continuous-Depth Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural differential equations
neural ordinary differential equations |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Sparsity in Continuous-Depth Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weight sparsity · 0.6regularization · 0.6feature sparsity · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Sparsity in Continuous-Depth Neural NetworksabstractNeural Ordinary Differential Equations (NODEs) have proven successful in learning dynamical systems in terms of accurately recovering the observed trajectories. While different types of sparsity have been proposed to improve robustness, the generalization properties of NODEs for dynamical systems beyond the observed data are underexplored. We systematically study the influence of weight and feature sparsity on forecasting as well as on identifying the underlying dynamical laws. Besides assessing existing methods, we propose a regularization technique to sparsify ``input-output connections'' and extract relevant features during training. Moreover, we curate real-world datasets including human motion capture and human hematopoiesis single-cell RNA-seq data to realistically analyze different levels of out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization in forecasting and dynamics identification respectively. Our extensive empirical evaluation on these challenging benchmarks suggests that weight sparsity improves generalization in the presence of noise or irregular sampling. However, it does not prevent learning spurious feature dependencies in the inferred dynamics, rendering them impractical for predictions under interventions, or for inferring the true underlying dynamics. Instead, feature sparsity can indeed help with recovering sparse ground-truth dynamics compared to unregularized NODEs. Hananeh Aliee, Till Richter, Mikhail Solonin, Ignacio Ibarra, Fabian J. Theis, Niki Kilbertus |
NeurIPS | 4 |