Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nora Belrose

dblp:332/2248 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 61% Language models and text generation · 10% Deep learning architectures and training · 9%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
2.432025
Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Models · ICML 2025
Do Transformer Interpretability Methods Transfer to RNNs? · AAAI 2025
LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed form · NeurIPS 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › model steering › language model steering
activation steering
0.912025
Do Transformer Interpretability Methods Transfer to RNNs? · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
feature interpretation
0.912025
Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Models · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
language model interpretability
0.912025
Do Transformer Interpretability Methods Transfer to RNNs? · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › mechanistic interpretability
sparse autoencoder
0.912025
Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Models · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics
0.812024
Neural Networks Learn Statistics of Increasing Complexity · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.712023
Adversarial Policies Beat Superhuman Go AIs · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias mitigation
0.712023
LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed form · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
concept erasure
0.712023
LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed form · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.712023
LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed form · NeurIPS 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
language model analysis
0.312025
Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Models · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network
0.312025
Do Transformer Interpretability Methods Transfer to RNNs? · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
representation analysis
0.212023
LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed form · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tuned lens · 0.9sparse autoencoder · 0.9latent knowledge elicitation · 0.9large language model · 0.9intervention scoring · 0.9contrastive activation addition · 0.9optimal transport · 0.8n-gram frequency analysis · 0.8zero-shot transfer · 0.7adversarial policy training · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Do Transformer Interpretability Methods Transfer to RNNs?
abstract
Recent advances in recurrent neural network architectures, such as Mamba and RWKV, have enabled RNNs to match or exceed the performance of equal-size transformers in terms of language modeling perplexity and downstream evaluations, suggesting that future systems may be built on completely new architectures. In this paper, we examine if selected interpretability methods originally designed for transformer language models will transfer to these up-and-coming recurrent architectures. Specifically, we focus on steering model outputs via contrastive activation addition, on eliciting latent predictions via the tuned lens, and eliciting latent knowledge from models fine-tuned to produce false outputs under certain conditions. Our results show that most of these techniques are effective when applied to RNNs, and we show that it is possible to improve some of them by taking advantage of RNNs' compressed state.
Gonçalo Paulo, Thomas Marshall, Nora Belrose
AAAI3
2025 Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Models
abstract
While the activations of neurons in deep neural networks usually do not have a simple human-understandable interpretation, sparse autoencoders (SAEs) can be used to transform these activations into a higher-dimensional latent space which can be more easily interpretable. However, SAEs can have millions of distinct latents, making it infeasible for humans to manually interpret each one. In this work, we build an open-source automated pipeline to generate and evaluate natural language interpretations for SAE latents using LLMs. We test our framework on SAEs of varying sizes, activation functions, and losses, trained on two different open-weight LLMs. We introduce five new techniques to score the quality of interpretations that are cheaper to run than the previous state of the art. One of these techniques, intervention scoring, evaluates the interpretability of the effects of intervening on a latent, which we find explains latents that are not recalled by existing methods. We propose guidelines for generating better interpretations that remain valid for a broader set of activating contexts, and discuss pitfalls with existing scoring techniques. Our code is available at https://github.com/EleutherAI/delphi.
Gonçalo Paulo, Alex Mallen, Caden Juang, Nora Belrose
ICML4
2024 Neural Networks Learn Statistics of Increasing Complexity
abstract
The _distributional simplicity bias_ (DSB) posits that neural networks learn low-order moments of the data distribution first, before moving on to higher-order correlations. In this work, we present compelling new evidence for the DSB by showing that networks automatically learn to perform well on maximum-entropy distributions whose low-order statistics match those of the training set early in training, then lose this ability later. We also extend the DSB to discrete domains by proving an equivalence between token $n$-gram frequencies and the moments of embedding vectors, and by finding empirical evidence for the bias in LLMs. Finally we use optimal transport methods to surgically edit the low-order statistics of one class to match those of another, and show that early-training networks treat the edited samples as if they were drawn from the target class. Code is available at https://github.com/EleutherAI/features-across-time.
Nora Belrose, Quintin Pope, Lucia Quirke, Alex Mallen, Xiaoli Z. Fern
ICML1
2023 Adversarial Policies Beat Superhuman Go AIs
abstract
We attack the state-of-the-art Go-playing AI system KataGo by training adversarial policies against it, achieving a $>$97% win rate against KataGo running at superhuman settings. Our adversaries do not win by playing Go well. Instead, they trick KataGo into making serious blunders. Our attack transfers zero-shot to other superhuman Go-playing AIs, and is comprehensible to the extent that human experts can implement it without algorithmic assistance to consistently beat superhuman AIs. The core vulnerability uncovered by our attack persists even in KataGo agents adversarially trained to defend against our attack. Our results demonstrate that even superhuman AI systems may harbor surprising failure modes. Example games are available https://goattack.far.ai/.
Tony T. Wang 0001, Adam Gleave, Tom Tseng, Kellin Pelrine, Nora Belrose, Joseph Miller, Michael Dennis 0001, Yawen Duan, Viktor Pogrebniak, Sergey Levine, Stuart Russell 0001
ICML5
2023 LEACE: Perfect linear concept erasure in closed form
abstract
Concept erasure aims to remove specified features from a representation. It can improve fairness (e.g. preventing a classifier from using gender or race) and interpretability (e.g. removing a concept to observe changes in model behavior). We introduce LEAst-squares Concept Erasure (LEACE), a closed-form method which provably prevents all linear classifiers from detecting a concept while changing the representation as little as possible, as measured by a broad class of norms. We apply LEACE to large language models with a novel procedure called concept scrubbing, which erases target concept information from _every_ layer in the network. We demonstrate our method on two tasks: measuring the reliance of language models on part-of-speech information, and reducing gender bias in BERT embeddings. Our code is available at https://github.com/EleutherAI/concept-erasure.
Nora Belrose, David Schneider-Joseph, Shauli Ravfogel, Ryan Cotterell, Edward Raff, Stella Biderman
NeurIPS1