Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Akhil Namburi

dblp:332/6585 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics
multi-view visualization
0.612022
Towards Systematic Design Considerations for Visualizing Cross-View Data Relationships · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2022
Visualization and visual analytics
visualization design
0.612022
Towards Systematic Design Considerations for Visualizing Cross-View Data Relationships · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

brushing and linking · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Towards Systematic Design Considerations for Visualizing Cross-View Data Relationships
abstract
Due to the scale of data and the complexity of analysis tasks, insight discovery often requires coordinating multiple visualizations (views), with each view displaying different parts of data or the same data from different perspectives. For example, to analyze car sales records, a marketing analyst uses a line chart to visualize the trend of car sales, a scatterplot to inspect the price and horsepower of different cars, and a matrix to compare the transaction amounts in types of deals. To explore related information across multiple views, current visual analysis tools heavily rely on brushing and linking techniques, which may require a significant amount of user effort (e.g., many trial-and-error attempts). There may be other efficient and effective ways of displaying cross-view data relationships to support data analysis with multiple views, but currently there are no guidelines to address this design challenge. In this article, we present systematic design considerations for visualizing cross-view data relationships, which leverages descriptive aspects of relationships and usable visual context of multi-view visualizations. We discuss pros and cons of different designs for showing cross-view data relationships, and provide a set of recommendations for helping practitioners make design decisions.
Maoyuan Sun, Akhil Namburi, David Koop, Jian Zhao 0010, Tianyi Li 0008, Haeyong Chung
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.2