Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Akhil Namburi
dblp:332/6585
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Visualization and visual analytics
multi-view visualization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Towards Systematic Design Considerations for Visualizing Cross-View Data Relationships · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2022 |
Visualization and visual analytics
visualization design |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Towards Systematic Design Considerations for Visualizing Cross-View Data Relationships · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
brushing and linking · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Towards Systematic Design Considerations for Visualizing Cross-View Data RelationshipsabstractDue to the scale of data and the complexity of analysis tasks, insight discovery often requires coordinating multiple visualizations (views), with each view displaying different parts of data or the same data from different perspectives. For example, to analyze car sales records, a marketing analyst uses a line chart to visualize the trend of car sales, a scatterplot to inspect the price and horsepower of different cars, and a matrix to compare the transaction amounts in types of deals. To explore related information across multiple views, current visual analysis tools heavily rely on brushing and linking techniques, which may require a significant amount of user effort (e.g., many trial-and-error attempts). There may be other efficient and effective ways of displaying cross-view data relationships to support data analysis with multiple views, but currently there are no guidelines to address this design challenge. In this article, we present systematic design considerations for visualizing cross-view data relationships, which leverages descriptive aspects of relationships and usable visual context of multi-view visualizations. We discuss pros and cons of different designs for showing cross-view data relationships, and provide a set of recommendations for helping practitioners make design decisions. Maoyuan Sun, Akhil Namburi, David Koop, Jian Zhao 0010, Tianyi Li 0008, Haeyong Chung |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 2 |