Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aldo Terán Espinoza

dblp:333/0806 · also Aldo Teran · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-2336-9401ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot navigation and mapping · 88% Legged, aerial and field robots · 12%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › SLAM
factor graph optimization
0.812024
Boundary Factors for Seamless State Estimation between Autonomous Underwater Docking Phases · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
SLAM
0.812024
Boundary Factors for Seamless State Estimation between Autonomous Underwater Docking Phases · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › underwater robotics
autonomous underwater vehicle
0.212024
Boundary Factors for Seamless State Estimation between Autonomous Underwater Docking Phases · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
docking
0.212024
Boundary Factors for Seamless State Estimation between Autonomous Underwater Docking Phases · ICRA 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

state estimation · 0.8factor graph optimization · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Boundary Factors for Seamless State Estimation between Autonomous Underwater Docking Phases
abstract
Autonomous underwater docking is of the utmost importance for expanding the capabilities of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs). Due to a historical focus on underwater docking to only static targets, the research gap in underwater docking to dynamically active targets has been left relatively untouched. We address the state estimation problem that arises when trying to rendezvous a chaser AUV with a dynamic target by modeling the scenario as a factor graph optimization-based Simultaneous Localization and Mapping problem. We present a set of boundary factors that aid the inference process by seamlessly transitioning the target’s state between the different observability stages, intrinsic to any dynamic docking scenario. We benchmark the performance of our approach using the Stonefish simulated environment.
Aldo Terán Espinoza, Antonio Terán Espinoza, John Folkesson, Peter Sigray, Jakob Kuttenkeuler
ICRA1