Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nathan J. Rollins

dblp:334/8504 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein design
0.712023
ProteinGym: Large-Scale Benchmarks for Protein Fitness Prediction and Design · NeurIPS 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction › protein variant effect prediction
protein fitness prediction
0.712023
ProteinGym: Large-Scale Benchmarks for Protein Fitness Prediction and Design · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

deep mutational scanning · 0.7benchmark evaluation · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 ProteinGym: Large-Scale Benchmarks for Protein Fitness Prediction and Design
abstract
Predicting the effects of mutations in proteins is critical to many applications, from understanding genetic disease to designing novel proteins to address our most pressing challenges in climate, agriculture and healthcare. Despite an increase in machine learning-based protein modeling methods, assessing their effectiveness is problematic due to the use of distinct, often contrived, experimental datasets and variable performance across different protein families. Addressing these challenges requires scale. To that end we introduce ProteinGym v1.0, a large-scale and holistic set of benchmarks specifically designed for protein fitness prediction and design. It encompasses both a broad collection of over 250 standardized deep mutational scanning assays, spanning millions of mutated sequences, as well as curated clinical datasets providing high-quality expert annotations about mutation effects. We devise a robust evaluation framework that combines metrics for both fitness prediction and design, factors in known limitations of the underlying experimental methods, and covers both zero-shot and supervised settings. We report the performance of a diverse set of over 40 high-performing models from various subfields (eg., mutation effects, inverse folding) into a unified benchmark. We open source the corresponding codebase, datasets, MSAs, structures, predictions and develop a user-friendly website that facilitates comparisons across all settings.
Pascal Notin, Aaron Kollasch, Daniel Ritter 0006, Lood van Niekerk, Steffanie Paul, Han Spinner, Nathan J. Rollins, Ada Shaw, Rose Orenbuch, Ruben Weitzman, Jonathan Frazer, Mafalda Dias, Dinko Franceschi, Yarin Gal, Debora S. Marks
NeurIPS7