Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sameeha Fatima
dblp:335/1005
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0000-3167-4065ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 87% Empirical software engineering · 13% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution › software variability
configuration options |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Paving a Path for a Combined Family of Feature Toggle and Configuration Option Research · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2024 |
Software maintenance and evolution
software configuration |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Paving a Path for a Combined Family of Feature Toggle and Configuration Option Research · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
qualitative analysis · 0.8model extension · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Paving a Path for a Combined Family of Feature Toggle and Configuration Option ResearchabstractFeature toggles and configuration options are techniques to include or exclude functionality in software. The research contributions to these two techniques have most often been focused on either one of them. However, focusing on the similarities of these two techniques and the use of a common terminology may enable a combined family of research on software configuration (a term we use to encompass both techniques) and prevent duplication of effort. The goal of this study is to aid researchers in conducting a family of research on software configuration by extending an existing model of software configuration that provides a common terminology for feature toggles and configuration options in research studies. We started with Siegmund et al.’s Model of Software Configuration (MSC), which was developed based on configuration option-related resources. We extend the MSC by qualitative analysis of feature toggle-related resources. From our analysis, we proposed MSCv2 and evaluated it through its application on publications and an industrial system. Our results indicate researchers studying the same system may provide different definitions of software configuration in publications, similar research questions may be answered repeatedly because of a lack of a clear definition of software configuration, and having an MSC may enable generalized research on this family of research. Rezvan Mahdavi-Hezaveh, Sameeha Fatima, Laurie A. Williams |
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. | 2 |