Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sameeha Fatima

dblp:335/1005 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0000-3167-4065ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 87% Empirical software engineering · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution › software variability
configuration options
0.812024
Paving a Path for a Combined Family of Feature Toggle and Configuration Option Research · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2024
Software maintenance and evolution
software configuration
0.812024
Paving a Path for a Combined Family of Feature Toggle and Configuration Option Research · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative analysis · 0.8model extension · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Paving a Path for a Combined Family of Feature Toggle and Configuration Option Research
abstract
Feature toggles and configuration options are techniques to include or exclude functionality in software. The research contributions to these two techniques have most often been focused on either one of them. However, focusing on the similarities of these two techniques and the use of a common terminology may enable a combined family of research on software configuration (a term we use to encompass both techniques) and prevent duplication of effort. The goal of this study is to aid researchers in conducting a family of research on software configuration by extending an existing model of software configuration that provides a common terminology for feature toggles and configuration options in research studies. We started with Siegmund et al.’s Model of Software Configuration (MSC), which was developed based on configuration option-related resources. We extend the MSC by qualitative analysis of feature toggle-related resources. From our analysis, we proposed MSCv2 and evaluated it through its application on publications and an industrial system. Our results indicate researchers studying the same system may provide different definitions of software configuration in publications, similar research questions may be answered repeatedly because of a lack of a clear definition of software configuration, and having an MSC may enable generalized research on this family of research.
Rezvan Mahdavi-Hezaveh, Sameeha Fatima, Laurie A. Williams
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol.2