VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Qijie Chen
dblp:335/8287
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-0661-652XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 50% Computing education · 50% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Medical and health informatics
biomedical natural language processing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | An extensive benchmark study on biomedical text generation and mining with ChatGPT · Bioinform. 2023 |
Computing education
large language model evaluation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | An extensive benchmark study on biomedical text generation and mining with ChatGPT · Bioinform. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prompt engineering · 1.3benchmarking · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | An extensive benchmark study on biomedical text generation and mining with ChatGPTabstractMOTIVATION: In recent years, the development of natural language process (NLP) technologies and deep learning hardware has led to significant improvement in large language models (LLMs). The ChatGPT, the state-of-the-art LLM built on GPT-3.5 and GPT-4, shows excellent capabilities in general language understanding and reasoning. Researchers also tested the GPTs on a variety of NLP-related tasks and benchmarks and got excellent results. With exciting performance on daily chat, researchers began to explore the capacity of ChatGPT on expertise that requires professional education for human and we are interested in the biomedical domain. RESULTS: To evaluate the performance of ChatGPT on biomedical-related tasks, this article presents a comprehensive benchmark study on the use of ChatGPT for biomedical corpus, including article abstracts, clinical trials description, biomedical questions, and so on. Typical NLP tasks like named entity recognization, relation extraction, sentence similarity, question and answering, and document classification are included. Overall, ChatGPT got a BLURB score of 58.50 while the state-of-the-art model had a score of 84.30. Through a series of experiments, we demonstrated the effectiveness and versatility of ChatGPT in biomedical text understanding, reasoning and generation, and the limitation of ChatGPT build on GPT-3.5. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All the datasets are available from BLURB benchmark https://microsoft.github.io/BLURB/index.html. The prompts are described in the article. Qijie Chen, Haotong Sun, Yinghui Jiang, Ting Ran, Xurui Jin, Xianglu Xiao, Zhimin Lin, Hongming Chen 0001, Zhangming Niu |
Bioinform. | 1 |