Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yechang Yang

dblp:336/2320 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 46% Representation and self-supervised learning · 46% Language models and text generation · 7%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.712023
Feature-Level Debiased Natural Language Understanding · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning › robust contrastive learning
debiased contrastive learning
0.712023
Feature-Level Debiased Natural Language Understanding · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
debiasing
0.712023
Feature-Level Debiased Natural Language Understanding · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.712023
Feature-Level Debiased Natural Language Understanding · AAAI 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
natural language understanding
0.212023
Feature-Level Debiased Natural Language Understanding · AAAI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

positive sampling · 0.7negative sampling · 0.7contrastive learning · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Feature-Level Debiased Natural Language Understanding
abstract
Natural language understanding (NLU) models often rely on dataset biases rather than intended task-relevant features to achieve high performance on specific datasets. As a result, these models perform poorly on datasets outside the training distribution. Some recent studies address this issue by reducing the weights of biased samples during the training process. However, these methods still encode biased latent features in representations and neglect the dynamic nature of bias, which hinders model prediction. We propose an NLU debiasing method, named debiasing contrastive learning (DCT), to simultaneously alleviate the above problems based on contrastive learning. We devise a debiasing, positive sampling strategy to mitigate biased latent features by selecting the least similar biased positive samples. We also propose a dynamic negative sampling strategy to capture the dynamic influence of biases by employing a bias-only model to dynamically select the most similar biased negative samples. We conduct experiments on three NLU benchmark datasets. Experimental results show that DCT outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on out-of-distribution datasets while maintaining in-distribution performance. We also verify that DCT can reduce biased latent features from the model's representation.
Yougang Lyu, Piji Li, Yechang Yang, Maarten de Rijke, Pengjie Ren, Yukun Zhao, Dawei Yin 0001, Zhaochun Ren
AAAI3