Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shaomu Tan
dblp:336/3005
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Machine translation · 48% Language models and text generation · 20% Efficient and distributed learning · 13% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › neural machine translation
multilingual neural machine translation |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Neuron Specialization: Leveraging Intrinsic Task Modularity for Multilingual Machine Translation · EMNLP 2024 Towards a Better Understanding of Variations in Zero-Shot Neural Machine Translation Performance · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
document-level machine translation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | What Does LLM Refinement Actually Improve? A Systematic Study on Document-Level Literary Translation · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
translation refinement |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | What Does LLM Refinement Actually Improve? A Systematic Study on Document-Level Literary Translation · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation › automatic evaluation
learned evaluation metric |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ReMedy: Learning Machine Translation Evaluation from Human Preferences with Reward Modeling · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
machine translation evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ReMedy: Learning Machine Translation Evaluation from Human Preferences with Reward Modeling · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward learning
reward modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ReMedy: Learning Machine Translation Evaluation from Human Preferences with Reward Modeling · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural network modularity |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Neuron Specialization: Leveraging Intrinsic Task Modularity for Multilingual Machine Translation · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › memory-efficient training
memory-efficient fine-tuning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Make Pre-trained Model Reversible: From Parameter to Memory Efficient Fine-Tuning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Make Pre-trained Model Reversible: From Parameter to Memory Efficient Fine-Tuning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation
pre-trained language model fine-tuning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Make Pre-trained Model Reversible: From Parameter to Memory Efficient Fine-Tuning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › neural machine translation › multilingual neural machine translation
zero-shot translation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards a Better Understanding of Variations in Zero-Shot Neural Machine Translation Performance · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | ReMedy: Learning Machine Translation Evaluation from Human Preferences with Reward Modeling · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
cross-lingual transfer |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Neuron Specialization: Leveraging Intrinsic Task Modularity for Multilingual Machine Translation · EMNLP 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
systematic evaluation · 1.0reward modeling · 0.9pairwise preference learning · 0.9large language model prompting · 0.9sparse networks · 0.8neuron identification · 0.8systematic experimentation · 0.7reversible network · 0.7adapter · 0.7activation recomputation · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | What Does LLM Refinement Actually Improve? A Systematic Study on Document-Level Literary TranslationabstractShaomu Tan, Dawei Zhu, Ke Tran, Michael Denkowski, Sony Trenous, Leonardo F. R. Ribeiro, Bill Byrne, Felix Hieber. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Shaomu Tan, Ke Tran, Michael J. Denkowski, Sony Trenous, Leonardo F. R. Ribeiro, William J. Byrne, Felix Hieber |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2025 | ReMedy: Learning Machine Translation Evaluation from Human Preferences with Reward ModelingabstractA key challenge in MT evaluation is the inherent noise and inconsistency of human ratings.Regression-based neural metrics struggle with this noise, while prompting LLMs shows promise at system-level evaluation but performs poorly at segment level.In this work, we propose ReMedy, a novel MT metric framework that reformulates translation evaluation as a reward modeling task.Instead of regressing on imperfect human ratings directly, ReMedy learns relative translation quality using pairwise preference data, resulting in a more reliable evaluation.In extensive experiments across WMT22-24 shared tasks (39 language pairs, 111 MT systems), ReMedy achieves stateof-the-art performance at both segment-and system-level evaluation.Specifically, ReMedy-9B surpasses larger WMT winners and massive closed LLMs such as MetricX-13B, XCOMET-Ensemble, GEMBA-GPT-4, PaLM-540B, and finetuned PaLM2.Further analyses demonstrate that ReMedy delivers superior capability in detecting translation errors and evaluating low-quality translations.1 Shaomu Tan, Christof Monz |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2024 | Neuron Specialization: Leveraging Intrinsic Task Modularity for Multilingual Machine TranslationabstractTraining a unified multilingual model promotes knowledge transfer but inevitably introduces negative interference.Language-specific modeling methods show promise in reducing interference.However, they often rely on heuristics to distribute capacity and struggle to foster cross-lingual transfer via isolated modules.In this paper, we explore intrinsic task modularity within multilingual networks and leverage these observations to circumvent interference under multilingual translation.We show that neurons in the feed-forward layers tend to be activated in a language-specific manner.Meanwhile, these specialized neurons exhibit structural overlaps that reflect language proximity, which progress across layers.Based on these findings, we propose Neuron Specialization, an approach that identifies specialized neurons to modularize feed-forward layers and then continuously updates them through sparse networks.Extensive experiments show that our approach achieves consistent performance gains over strong baselines with additional analyses demonstrating reduced interference and increased knowledge transfer.1 Shaomu Tan, Christof Monz |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2023 | Towards a Better Understanding of Variations in Zero-Shot Neural Machine Translation PerformanceabstractMultilingual Neural Machine Translation (MNMT) facilitates knowledge sharing but often suffers from poor zero-shot (ZS) translation qualities.While prior work has explored the causes of overall low zero-shot translation qualities, our work introduces a fresh perspective: the presence of significant variations in zeroshot performance.This suggests that MNMT does not uniformly exhibit poor zero-shot capability; instead, certain translation directions yield reasonable results.Through systematic experimentation, spanning 1,560 language directions across 40 languages, we identify three key factors contributing to high variations in ZS NMT performance: 1) target-side translation quality, 2) vocabulary overlap, and 3) linguistic properties.Our findings highlight that the target side translation quality is the most influential factor, with vocabulary overlap consistently impacting zero-shot capabilities.Additionally, linguistic properties, such as language family and writing system, play a role, particularly with smaller models.Furthermore, we suggest that the off-target issue is a symptom of inadequate performance, emphasizing that zero-shot translation challenges extend beyond addressing the off-target problem.To support future research, we release the data and models as a benchmark for the study of ZS NMT. 1 Shaomu Tan, Christof Monz |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2023 | Make Pre-trained Model Reversible: From Parameter to Memory Efficient Fine-TuningabstractParameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) of pre-trained language models (PLMs) has emerged as a highly successful approach, with training only a small number of parameters without sacrificing performance and becoming the de-facto learning paradigm with the increasing size of PLMs. However, existing PEFT methods are not memory-efficient, because they still require caching most of the intermediate activations for the gradient calculation, akin to fine-tuning. One effective way to reduce the activation memory is to apply a reversible model, so the intermediate activations are not necessary to be cached and can be recomputed. Nevertheless, modifying a PLM to its reversible variant is not straightforward, since the reversible model has a distinct architecture from the currently released PLMs. In this paper, we first investigate what is a key factor for the success of existing PEFT methods, and realize that it's essential to preserve the PLM's starting point when initializing a PEFT method. With this finding, we propose memory-efficient fine-tuning (MEFT) that inserts adapters into a PLM, preserving the PLM's starting point and making it reversible without additional pre-training. We evaluate MEFT on the GLUE benchmark and five question-answering tasks with various backbones, BERT, RoBERTa, BART and OPT. MEFT significantly reduces the activation memory up to 84% of full fine-tuning with a negligible amount of trainable parameters. Moreover, MEFT achieves the same score on GLUE and a comparable score on the question-answering tasks as full fine-tuning. A similar finding is also observed for the image classification task. Baohao Liao, Shaomu Tan, Christof Monz |
NeurIPS | 2 |