Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

James Gee

dblp:337/3669 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › computational neuroscience
brain encoding
0.812024
Brain Decodes Deep Nets · CVPR 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

factortopy · 0.8brain fMRI encoding · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Brain Decodes Deep Nets
abstract
We developed a tool for visualizing and analyzing large pre-trained vision models by mapping them onto the brain, thus exposing their hidden inside. Our innovation arises from a surprising usage of brain encoding: predicting brain fMRI measurements in response to images. We report two findings. First, explicit mapping between the brain and deep-network features across dimensions of space, layers, scales, and channels is crucial. This mapping method, Fac-torTopy, is plug-and-play for any deep-network; with it, one can paint a picture of the network onto the brain (liter-ally!). Second, our visualization shows how different training methods matter: they lead to remarkable differences in hierarchical organization and scaling behavior, growing with more data or network capacity. It also provides in-sight into fine-tuning: how pre-trained models change when adapting to small datasets. We found brain-like hierarchi-cally organized network suffer less from catastrophic for-getting after fine-tuned.
Huzheng Yang, James Gee, Jianbo Shi
CVPR2
2023 Information bottleneck-based interpretable multitask network for breast cancer classification and segmentation
Junxia Wang, Yuanjie Zheng, Xinmeng Li, Chongjing Wang, James Gee, Wenhui Huang 0002
Medical Image Anal.6