Simulating the workload is an essential procedure in microservice systems as it helps augment realistic workloads whilst safeguarding user privacy. The efficacy of such simulation depends on its dynamic assessment. The straightforward and most efficient approach to this is comparing the original workload with the simulated one using Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), which capture the state of the system. Nonetheless, due to the extensive volume and complexity of KPIs, fully evaluating them is not feasible, and measuring their similarity poses a significant challenge. This paper introduces a similarity metric algorithm for KPIs, the Extended Shape-Based Distance (ESBD), which gauges similarity in both shape and intensity. Additionally, we propose a KPI-based Evaluation Framework for Workload Simulations (KEWS), comprising three modules: preprocessing, compression, and evaluation. These methodologies effectively counteract the adverse effects of KPIs’ characteristics and offer a holistic evaluation. Experimental results substantiate the effectiveness of both ESBD and KEWS.

Cloud computing technologies, including cloud-native and containerization, have gained prominence in recent years, attributed to their exceptional scalability, enhanced resource utilization, and expedited deployment capabilities. However, their inherent complexity and the intricate interplay of internal components heighten the risk of sporadic and unforeseen anomalies. To address these challenges, Root Cause Analysis (RCA) is employed to accurately identify problematic services (pods) and mine the precise faults behind observed anomalies. Tailored to the limitations of conventional RCA algorithms, we propose a novel approach that jointly models operation entities and their relationships as learnable embeddings. Additionally, this method integrates fault propagation information to further improve RCA accuracy. Our evaluation involves developing a prototype within the Kubernetes cloud-native system. Extensive experimental results validate the efficacy of our approach.

Microservices are widely adopted in large IT enterprises, leveraging the scalability, resiliency, and elasticity of the cloud-native architecture. Effective root cause analysis is crucial for ensuring the reliability of such cloud-native systems. Many efforts have focused on using the three modalities of observability data–traces, metrics, and logs. However, existing approaches are limited by inconsistent problem definitions and cloud-native heterogeneity. To address these challenges, we proposeHolisticRCA, a root cause analysis framework in cloud-native systems from a holistic perspective.HolisticRCAformally defines root cause analysis through three dimensions. ThenHolisticRCAuses an “assembling building blocks” strategy to address the cloud-native heterogeneity. It maps each observability feature into a shared vector space and concatenates the vector embeddings associated with each resource entity for standardized resource entity vector embeddings. Then it applies Graph Attention Network to capture intertwined resource entity relations and incorporates mask embeddings to enable holistic analysis. The evaluation results on three public datasets show thatHolisticRCAoutperforms existing approaches in holistic root cause analysis of cloud-native systems.