VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ruitao Leng
dblp:338/7453
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 56% Language models and text generation · 44% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › efficient language model
efficient language model architectures |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Scaling Laws for Linear Complexity Language Models · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Scaling Laws for Linear Complexity Language Models · EMNLP 2024 |
Geometric modeling and processing
mesh generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | CircNet: Meshing 3D Point Clouds with Circumcenter Detection · ICLR 2023 |
Geometric modeling and processing › mesh generation › surface meshing
point cloud meshing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | CircNet: Meshing 3D Point Clouds with Circumcenter Detection · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Scaling Laws for Linear Complexity Language Models · EMNLP 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
scaling law analysis · 0.8linear attention · 0.8linear RNN · 0.8neural network · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Scaling Laws for Linear Complexity Language ModelsabstractThe interest in linear complexity models for large language models is on the rise, although their scaling capacity remains uncertain.In this study, we present the scaling laws for linear complexity language models to establish a foundation for their scalability.Specifically, we examine the scaling behaviors of three efficient linear architectures.These include TNL (Qin et al., 2024c), a linear attention model with data-independent decay; HGRN2 (Qin et al., 2024e), a linear RNN with data-dependent decay; and cosFormer2 (Qin et al., 2022b(Qin et al., , 2024a)), a linear attention model without decay.We also include LLaMA as a baseline architecture for comparison with softmax attention.These models were trained with six variants, ranging from 70M to 7B parameters on a 300B-token corpus, and evaluated with a total of 1,376 intermediate checkpoints on various downstream tasks.These tasks include validation loss, commonsense reasoning, and information retrieval and generation.The study reveals that existing linear complexity language models exhibit similar scaling capabilities as conventional transformer-based models while also demonstrating superior linguistic proficiency and knowledge retention. Xuyang Shen, Dong Li 0033, Ruitao Leng, Zhen Qin 0003, Weigao Sun, Yiran Zhong |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2023 | CircNet: Meshing 3D Point Clouds with Circumcenter Detection
Huan Lei, Ruitao Leng, Liang Zheng 0001, Hongdong Li |
ICLR | 2 |