Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kevin Rizk

dblp:339/0079 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 37% Trustworthy machine learning · 18% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 18%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory
boolean function learning
1.422024
Generalization on the Unseen, Logic Reasoning and Degree Curriculum · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Generalization on the Unseen, Logic Reasoning and Degree Curriculum · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization
generalization on the unseen
1.422024
Generalization on the Unseen, Logic Reasoning and Degree Curriculum · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Generalization on the Unseen, Logic Reasoning and Degree Curriculum · ICML 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
logic-based reasoning
1.422024
Generalization on the Unseen, Logic Reasoning and Degree Curriculum · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Generalization on the Unseen, Logic Reasoning and Degree Curriculum · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
out-of-distribution generalization
1.422024
Generalization on the Unseen, Logic Reasoning and Degree Curriculum · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Generalization on the Unseen, Logic Reasoning and Degree Curriculum · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
curriculum learning
0.812024
Generalization on the Unseen, Logic Reasoning and Degree Curriculum · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › compositional generalization
length generalization
0.712023
Generalization on the Unseen, Logic Reasoning and Degree Curriculum · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.712023
Generalization on the Unseen, Logic Reasoning and Degree Curriculum · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transformer · 0.8fourier analysis · 0.8SGD · 0.8min-degree interpolation · 0.7gradient descent · 0.7degree curriculum · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Generalization on the Unseen, Logic Reasoning and Degree Curriculum
abstract
This paper considers the learning of logical (Boolean) functions with a focus on the generalization on the unseen (GOTU) setting, a strong case of out-of-distribution generalization. This is motivated by the fact that the rich combinatorial nature of data in certain reasoning tasks (e.g., arithmetic/logic) makes representative data sampling challenging, and learning successfully under GOTU gives a first vignette of an 'extrapolating' or 'reasoning' learner. We study how different network architectures trained by (S)GD perform under GOTU and provide both theoretical and experimental evidence that for sparse functions and a class of network models including instances of Transformers, random features models, and linear networks, a min-degree-interpolator is learned on the unseen. More specifically, this means an interpolator of the training data that has minimal Fourier mass on the higher degree basis elements. These findings lead to two implications: (1) we provide an explanation to the length generalization problem for Boolean functions (e.g., Anil et al. 2022); (2) we introduce a curriculum learning algorithm called Degree-Curriculum that learns monomials more efficiently by incrementing supports. Finally, we discuss extensions to other models or non-sparse regimes where the min-degree bias may still occur or fade, as well as how it can be potentially corrected when undesirable.
Emmanuel Abbe, Samy Bengio, Aryo Lotfi, Kevin Rizk
J. Mach. Learn. Res.4
2023 Generalization on the Unseen, Logic Reasoning and Degree Curriculum
abstract
This paper considers the learning of logical (Boolean) functions with focus on the generalization on the unseen (GOTU) setting, a strong case of out-of-distribution generalization. This is motivated by the fact that the rich combinatorial nature of data in certain reasoning tasks (e.g., arithmetic/logic) makes representative data sampling challenging, and learning successfully under GOTU gives a first vignette of an ’extrapolating’ or ’reasoning’ learner. We then study how different network architectures trained by (S)GD perform under GOTU and provide both theoretical and experimental evidence that for a class of network models including instances of Transformers, random features models, and diagonal linear networks, a min-degree-interpolator is learned on the unseen. We also provide evidence that other instances with larger learning rates or mean-field networks reach leaky min-degree solutions. These findings lead to two implications: (1) we provide an explanation to the length generalization problem (e.g., Anil et al. 2022); (2) we introduce a curriculum learning algorithm called Degree-Curriculum that learns monomials more efficiently by incrementing supports.
Emmanuel Abbe, Samy Bengio, Aryo Lotfi, Kevin Rizk
ICML4