Sara Oblak

dblp:339/0116 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 46% 3D vision · 30% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 23%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene reconstruction
dynamic reconstruction
0.912025
ReMatching Dynamic Reconstruction Flow · ICLR 2025
Geometric modeling and processing › 3d reconstruction › 3d scene reconstruction
dynamic scene reconstruction
0.912025
ReMatching Dynamic Reconstruction Flow · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
0.712023
Zero-shot causal learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal effect estimation › treatment effect estimation
individual treatment effect estimation
0.712023
Zero-shot causal learning · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
0.712023
Zero-shot causal learning · NeurIPS 2023
Medical and health informatics
precision medicine
0.212023
Zero-shot causal learning · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

velocity field matching · 1.7deformation prior · 1.7meta-model training · 1.3causal meta-learning · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 ReMatching Dynamic Reconstruction Flow
abstract
Reconstructing a dynamic scene from image inputs is a fundamental computer vision task with many downstream applications. Despite recent advancements, existing approaches still struggle to achieve high-quality reconstructions from unseen viewpoints and timestamps. This work introduces the ReMatching framework, designed to improve reconstruction quality by incorporating deformation priors into dynamic reconstruction models. Our approach advocates for velocity-field based priors, for which we suggest a matching procedure that can seamlessly supplement existing dynamic reconstruction pipelines. The framework is highly adaptable and can be applied to various dynamic representations. Moreover, it supports integrating multiple types of model priors and enables combining simpler ones to create more complex classes. Our evaluations on popular benchmarks involving both synthetic and real-world dynamic scenes demonstrate that augmenting current state-of-the-art methods with our approach leads to a clear improvement in reconstruction accuracy.
Sara Oblak, Despoina Paschalidou, Sanja Fidler, Matan Atzmon
ICLR1
2023 Zero-shot causal learning
abstract
Predicting how different interventions will causally affect a specific individual is important in a variety of domains such as personalized medicine, public policy, and online marketing. There are a large number of methods to predict the effect of an existing intervention based on historical data from individuals who received it. However, in many settings it is important to predict the effects of novel interventions (e.g., a newly invented drug), which these methods do not address. Here, we consider zero-shot causal learning: predicting the personalized effects of a novel intervention. We propose CaML, a causal meta-learning framework which formulates the personalized prediction of each intervention's effect as a task. CaML trains a single meta-model across thousands of tasks, each constructed by sampling an intervention, its recipients, and its nonrecipients. By leveraging both intervention information (e.g., a drug's attributes) and individual features (e.g., a patient's history), CaML is able to predict the personalized effects of novel interventions that do not exist at the time of training. Experimental results on real world datasets in large-scale medical claims and cell-line perturbations demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. Most strikingly, CaML's zero-shot predictions outperform even strong baselines trained directly on data from the test interventions.
Hamed Nilforoshan, Michael Moor, Yusuf H. Roohani, Anja Surina, Michihiro Yasunaga, Sara Oblak, Jure Leskovec
NeurIPS7