In this paper, we explore the limits of algorithmic meta-theorems for combinatorial reconfiguration on graphs and prove several intractability results for highly restricted cases, which tightly complement the positive results by Mouawad et al. [IPEC 2014] and Gima et al. [Algorithmica 2024]. In this setting, we study reconfiguration problems on graphs in which the feasible sets are defined by formulas of first-order or monadic second-order logic: for a formula φ(X) with a free set variable X, the problem asks whether two given sets are connected by a token-jumping sequence in which every set satisfies φ on the input graph. Our main contribution is to show that the problem is intractable even for first-order logic and for severely restricted graphs, such as paths and disjoint unions of stars or cliques. Combined with known results, these results settle the parameterized complexity for most of the well-studied structural parameters. We also study the setting where the sets to be reconfigured are small, i.e., their size is part of the parameter, and show that even in this setting the problem is hard for caterpillars, whereas it becomes tractable even for monadic second-order logic when parameterized additionally by shrub-depth.

We study the model-checking problem for first- and monadic second-order logic on finite relational structures. The problem of verifying whether a formula of these logics is true on a given structure is considered intractable in general, but it does become tractable on interesting classes of structures, such as on classes whose Gaifman graphs have bounded treewidth. In this article, we continue this line of research and study model-checking for first- and monadic second-order logic in the presence of an ordering on the input structure. We do so in two settings: the general ordered case, where the input structures are equipped with a fixed order or successor relation, and the order-invariant case, where the formulas may resort to an ordering, but their truth must be independent of the particular choice of order. In the first setting we show very strong intractability results for most interesting classes of structures. In contrast, in the order-invariant case we obtain tractability results for order-invariant monadic second-order formulas on the same classes of graphs as in the unordered case. For first-order logic, we obtain tractability of successor-invariant formulas on classes whose Gaifman graphs have bounded expansion. Furthermore, we show that model-checking for order-invariant first-order formulas is tractable on coloured posets of bounded width.

We prove that whenever G is a graph from a nowhere dense graph class C, and A is a subset of vertices of G, then the number of subsets of A that are realized as intersections of A with r-neighborhoods of vertices of G is at most f(r,eps)|A|^(1+eps), where r is any positive integer, eps is any positive real, and f is a function that depends only on the class C. This yields a characterization of nowhere dense classes of graphs in terms of neighborhood complexity, which answers a question posed by [Reidl et al., CoRR, 2016]. As an algorithmic application of the above result, we show that for every fixed integer r, the parameterized Distance-r Dominating Set problem admits an almost linear kernel on any nowhere dense graph class. This proves a conjecture posed by [Drange et al., STACS 2016], and shows that the limit of parameterized tractability of Distance-r Dominating Set on subgraph-closed graph classes lies exactly on the boundary between nowhere denseness and somewhere denseness.

We study the expressive power and succinctness of order-invariant sentences of first-order (FO) and monadic second-order (MSO) logic on structures of bounded tree-depth. Order-invariance is undecidable in general and, thus, one strives for logics with a decidable syntax that have the same expressive power as order-invariant sentences. We show that on structures of bounded tree-depth, order-invariant FO has the same expressive power as FO. Our proof technique allows for a fine-grained analysis of the succinctness of this translation. We show that for every order-invariant FO sentence there exists an FO sentence whose size is elementary in the size of the original sentence, and whose number of quantifier alternations is linear in the tree-depth. We obtain similar results for MSO. It is known that the expressive power of MSO and FO coincide on structures of bounded tree-depth. We provide a translation from MSO to FO and we show that this translation is essentially optimal regarding the formula size. As a further result, we show that order-invariant MSO has the same expressive power as FO with modulo-counting quantifiers on bounded tree-depth structures.

We show that the model-checking problem for successor-invariant first-order logic is fixed-parameter tractable on graphs with excluded topological subgraphs when parameterised by both the size of the input formula and the size of the exluded topological subgraph. Furthermore, we show that model-checking for order-invariant first-order logic is tractable on coloured posets of bounded width, parameterised by both the size of the input formula and the width of the poset. Our result for successor-invariant FO extends previous results for this logic on planar graphs (Engelmann et al., LICS 2012) and graphs with excluded minors (Eickmeyer et al., LICS 2013), further narrowing the gap between what is known for FO and what is known for successor-invariant FO. The proof uses Grohe and Marx's structure theorem for graphs with excluded topological subgraphs. For order-invariant FO we show that Gajarský et al.'s recent result for FO carries over to order-invariant FO.

Model checking problems for first- and monadic second-order logic on graphs have received considerable attention in the past, not the least due to their connections to problems in algorithmic graph structure theory. While the model checking problem for these logics on general graphs is computationally intractable, it becomes tractable on important classes of graphs such as those of bounded tree-width, planar graphs or more generally, classes of graphs excluding a fixed minor. It is well known that allowing an order relation or successor function can greatly increase the expressive power of the respective logics. This remains true even in cases where we require the formulas to be order- or successor-invariant, that is, while they can use an order relation, their truth in a given graph must not depend on the particular ordering or successor function chosen. Naturally, the question arises whether this increase in expressive power comes at a cost in terms of tractability on specific classes of graphs. In LICS 2012, Engelmann et al. studied this problem and showed that order-invariant monadic second-order logic (MSO) remains tractable on the same classes of graphs than MSO without an ordering. That is, adding order-invariance to MSO essentially comes at no extra cost in terms of model checking complexity. For successor-invariant first-order logic something similar should be true. However, they only managed to show that successor-invariant first-order logic is tractable on the class of planar graphs which is very far from the best tractability results currently known for first-order logic. In this paper we significantly improve the latter result and show that successor-invariant first-order logic is tractable on any class of graphs excluding a fixed minor. This is much closer to the best results known for FO without an ordering. The proof relies on the construction of k-walks in suitable supergraphs of the input graphs, i.e., walks which visit every vertex at least once and at most k times, for some k depending on the excluded minor H. The supergraphs may in general contain H minors, but they still exclude some possible larger minor H', so by results of Flum and Grohe [20] model checking on these graphs is still fixed-parameter tractable.

We prove that the weighted monotone circuit satisfiability problem has no fixed-parameter tractable approximation algorithm with constant or polylogarithmic approximation ratio unless FPT = W[P]. Our result answers a question of Alekhnovich and Razborov, who proved that the weighted monotone circuit satisfiability problem has no fixed-parameter tractable 2-approximation algorithm unless every problem in W[P] can be solved by a randomized fpt algorithm and asked whether their result can be derandomized. Alekhnovich and Razborov used their inapproximability result as a lemma for proving that resolution is not automatizable unless W[P] is contained in randomized FPT. It is an immediate consequence of our result that the complexity theoretic assumption can be weakened to W[P] =!= FPT. The decision version of the monotone circuit satisfiability problem is known to be complete for the class W[P]. By reducing them to the monotone circuit satisfiability problem with suitable approximation preserving reductions, we prove similar inapproximability results for all other natural minimisation problems known to be W[P]-complete.