Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Matthew B. Lowrie

dblp:34/2639 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 65% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 29% Electronic design automation · 6%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
fault tolerance techniques
0.011987
Reconfigurable Tree Architectures Using Subtree Oriented Fault Tolerance · IEEE Trans. Computers 1987
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
fault-tolerant architecture
0.011987
Reconfigurable Tree Architectures Using Subtree Oriented Fault Tolerance · IEEE Trans. Computers 1987
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › reconfiguration
spare allocation
0.011987
Reconfigurable Tree Architectures Using Subtree Oriented Fault Tolerance · IEEE Trans. Computers 1987
Electronic design automation › physical design
VLSI layout
0.011987
Reconfigurable Tree Architectures Using Subtree Oriented Fault Tolerance · IEEE Trans. Computers 1987

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequential architecture · 0.0parallel architecture · 0.0subtree-oriented fault tolerance · 0.0performance degradation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1989 Computers for symbolic processing
abstract
A detailed survey on the motivations, design, applications, current status, and limitations of computers designed for symbolic processing is provided. Symbolic processing computations are performed at the word, relation, or meaning levels, and the knowledge used in symbolic applications may be fuzzy, uncertain, indeterminate, and ill represented. Various techniques for knowledge representation and processing are discussed from both the designers' and users' points of view. The design and choice of a suitable language for symbolic processing and the mapping of applications into a software architecture are then considered. The process of refining the application requirements into hardware and software architectures is treated, and state-of-art sequential and parallel computers designed for symbolic processing are discussed.>
Benjamin W. Wah, Matthew B. Lowrie, Guo-Jie Li
Proc. IEEE2
1988 Learning heuristic functions for numeric optimization problems
abstract
Provides a framework for approaching the learning of heuristic functions for numeric optimization problem solutions. The outline of a system called 'Techniques using Experimentation for Acquisition and Creation of HeuRistics 2.0' (TEACHER 2.0), for learning heuristic functions is presented. The system is unique in that it combines many learning techniques into one coherent system. It can be a powerful learning system as it allows the generation of heuristics based on an amalgamation of learning techniques and strategies. The value of the system is illustrated by an example in which TEACHER 2.0 learns a new heuristic that is superior to the typical heuristic for that problem domain.>
Matthew B. Lowrie, Benjamin W. Wah
COMPSAC1
1987 Reconfigurable Tree Architectures Using Subtree Oriented Fault Tolerance
abstract
An approach to the design of reconfigurable tree architectures is presented in which spare processors are allocated at the leaves. The approach is unique in that spares are associated with subtrees and sharing of spares between these subtrees can occur. The Subtree Oriented Fault Tolerance (SOFT) approach is more reliable than previous approaches capable of tolerating link and switch failures for both single-chip and multichip tree implementations while reducing redundancy in terms of both spare processors and links. VLSI layout is O(n) for binary trees and is directly extensible to N-ary trees and fault tolerance through performance degradation.
Matthew B. Lowrie, W. Kent Fuchs
IEEE Trans. Computers1