Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

E. Michael Keen

dblp:34/3873 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › ranking › search ranking
proximity ranking
0.011992
Term Position Ranking: Some New Test Results · SIGIR 1992
Information retrieval
ranking
0.011992
Term Position Ranking: Some New Test Results · SIGIR 1992
Information retrieval
evaluation
0.011992
Term Position Ranking: Some New Test Results · SIGIR 1992
Information retrieval › evaluation
test collection
0.011992
Term Position Ranking: Some New Test Results · SIGIR 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

term weighting · 0.0stemming · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1992 Term Position Ranking: Some New Test Results
abstract
Presents seven sets of laboratory results testing variables in term position ranking which produce a phrase effect by weighting the distance between proximate terms. Results of the 73 tests conducted by this project are included, covering variant term position algorithms, sentence boundaries, stopword counting, every pairs testing, field selection, and combinations of algorithm including collection frequency, record frequency and searcher weighted. The discussion includes the results of tests by Fagan and by Croft, the need for term stemming, proximity as a precision device, comparisons with Boolean, and the quality of test collections.
E. Michael Keen
SIGIR1
1992 Presenting Results of Experimental Retrieval Comparisons
E. Michael Keen
Inf. Process. Manag.1
1978 Methods of teaching on-line bibliographic searching: Experience at the College of Librarianship Wales
Lucy A. Tedd, E. Michael Keen
Inf. Process. Manag.2