Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Olexandr Isayev
dblp:34/4930
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-7581-8497ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 61% Graph learning · 39% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 76% Computational science and engineering · 24% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MolErr2Fix: Benchmarking LLM Trustworthiness in Chemistry via Modular Error Detection, Localization, Explanation, and Correction · EMNLP 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics
cheminformatics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MolErr2Fix: Benchmarking LLM Trustworthiness in Chemistry via Modular Error Detection, Localization, Explanation, and Correction · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Over Molecular Conformer Ensembles: Datasets and Benchmarks · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph representation learning
molecular graph representation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Over Molecular Conformer Ensembles: Datasets and Benchmarks · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation › uncertainty-aware learning
uncertainty-aware classification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Uncertainty-Aware Yield Prediction with Multimodal Molecular Features · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Uncertainty-Aware Yield Prediction with Multimodal Molecular Features · AAAI 2024 |
Computational science and engineering
computational chemistry |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Uncertainty-Aware Yield Prediction with Multimodal Molecular Features · AAAI 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics
molecular representation learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Over Molecular Conformer Ensembles: Datasets and Benchmarks · ICLR 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
drug discovery |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Learning Over Molecular Conformer Ensembles: Datasets and Benchmarks · ICLR 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational microbiology
biosynthetic gene cluster analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Inter-Modular Linkers play a crucial role in governing the biosynthesis of non-ribosomal peptides · Bioinform. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
error localization · 1.7error detection · 1.7error correction · 1.7multimodal learning · 1.5molecular graph representation · 1.5graph neural network · 1.5ensemble learning · 1.5SMILES · 1.5sequence parsing · 0.4database construction · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Proto-Yield: An Uncertainty-Aware Prototype Network for Yield Prediction in Real-world Chemical ReactionsabstractReaction yield prediction underpins computer-aided synthesis prediction (CASP). Formulated as a regression problem that takes both reactants and products as input, this task has been extensively studied using machine learning methods, based on handcrafted fingerprint features, SMILES encoded by Transformers, and molecular graphs encoded by Graph Neural Networks. However, a major limitation of these methods is their inability to effectively capture and model the underlying uncertainties, arising both from the inherently stochastic nature of chemical reaction processes and from inconsistencies or noise in how yields are measured and reported. What makes this seemingly simple regression problem even more challenging is the lack of any principled way to account for the underlying uncertainties, due to missing or unrecorded experimental process (commonly happens in chemical labs). Kehan Guo, Zhen Liu 0069, Zhichun Guo, Bozhao Nan, Olexandr Isayev, Nitesh V. Chawla, Olaf Wiest, Xiangliang Zhang 0001 |
CIKM | 5 |
| 2025 | MolErr2Fix: Benchmarking LLM Trustworthiness in Chemistry via Modular Error Detection, Localization, Explanation, and CorrectionabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) have shown growing potential in molecular sciences, but they often produce chemically inaccurate descriptions and struggle to recognize or justify potential errors.This raises important concerns about their robustness and reliability in scientific applications.To support more rigorous evaluation of LLMs in chemical reasoning, we present the MOLERR2FIX benchmark, designed to assess LLMs on error detection and correction in molecular descriptions.Unlike existing benchmarks focused on molecule-totext generation or property prediction, MOL-ERR2FIX emphasizes fine-grained chemical understanding.It tasks LLMs with identifying, localizing, explaining, and revising potential structural and semantic errors in molecular descriptions.Specifically, MOLERR2FIX consists of 1,193 fine-grained annotated error instances.Each instance contains quadruple annotations, i.e,.(error type, span location, the explanation, and the correction).These tasks are intended to reflect the types of reasoning and verification required in real-world chemical communication.Evaluations of current stateof-the-art LLMs reveal notable performance gaps, underscoring the need for more robust chemical reasoning capabilities.MolErr2Fix provides a focused benchmark for evaluating such capabilities and aims to support progress toward more reliable and chemically informed language models.All annotations and accompanying evaluation code are publicly available to facilitate future research. Yuyang Wu, Jinhui Ye, Lu Dai 0001, Yonatan Bisk, Olexandr Isayev |
EMNLP | 6 |
| 2024 | Uncertainty-Aware Yield Prediction with Multimodal Molecular FeaturesabstractPredicting chemical reaction yields is pivotal for efficient chemical synthesis, an area that focuses on the creation of novel compounds for diverse uses. Yield prediction demands accurate representations of reactions for forecasting practical transformation rates. Yet, the uncertainty issues broadcasting in real-world situations prohibit current models to excel in this task owing to the high sensitivity of yield activities and the uncertainty in yield measurements. Existing models often utilize single-modal feature representations, such as molecular fingerprints, SMILES sequences, or molecular graphs, which is not sufficient to capture the complex interactions and dynamic behavior of molecules in reactions. In this paper, we present an advanced Uncertainty-Aware Multimodal model (UAM) to tackle these challenges. Our approach seamlessly integrates data sources from multiple modalities by encompassing sequence representations, molecular graphs, and expert-defined chemical reaction features for a comprehensive representation of reactions. Additionally, we address both the model and data-based uncertainty, refining the model's predictive capability. Extensive experiments on three datasets, including two high throughput experiment (HTE) datasets and one chemist-constructed Amide coupling reaction dataset, demonstrate that UAM outperforms the state-of-the-art methods. The code and used datasets are available at https://github.com/jychen229/Multimodal-reaction-yield-prediction. Jiayuan Chen 0003, Kehan Guo, Zhen Liu 0069, Olexandr Isayev, Xiangliang Zhang 0001 |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2024 | Learning Over Molecular Conformer Ensembles: Datasets and BenchmarksabstractMolecular Representation Learning (MRL) has proven impactful in numerous biochemical applications such as drug discovery and enzyme design. While Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are effective at learning molecular representations from a 2D molecular graph or a single 3D structure, existing works often overlook the flexible nature of molecules, which continuously interconvert across conformations via chemical bond rotations and minor vibrational perturbations. To better account for molecular flexibility, some recent works formulate MRL as an ensemble learning problem, focusing on explicitly learning from a set of conformer structures. However, most of these studies have limited datasets, tasks, and models. In this work, we introduce the first MoleculAR Conformer Ensemble Learning (MARCEL) benchmark to thoroughly evaluate the potential of learning on con- former ensembles and suggest promising research directions. MARCEL includes four datasets covering diverse molecule- and reaction-level properties of chemically diverse molecules including organocatalysts and transition-metal catalysts, extending beyond the scope of common GNN benchmarks that are confined to drug-like molecules. In addition, we conduct a comprehensive empirical study, which benchmarks representative 1D, 2D, and 3D MRL models, along with two strategies that explicitly incorporate conformer ensembles into 3D models. Our findings reveal that direct learning from an accessible conformer space can improve performance on a variety of tasks and models. Yanqiao Zhu 0001, Jeehyun Hwang, Keir Adams, Zhen Liu 0069, Bozhao Nan, Brock Stenfors, Yuanqi Du, Jatin Chauhan, Olaf Wiest, Olexandr Isayev, Connor W. Coley, Yizhou Sun, Wei Wang 0010 |
ICLR | 10 |
| 2021 | Harnessing the Power of Smart and Connected Health to Tackle COVID-19: IoT, AI, Robotics, and Blockchain for a Better WorldabstractAs COVID-19 hounds the world, the common cause of finding a swift solution to manage the pandemic has brought together researchers, institutions, governments, and society at large. The Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI)-including machine learning (ML) and Big Data analytics-as well as Robotics and Blockchain, are the four decisive areas of technological innovation that have been ingenuity harnessed to fight this pandemic and future ones. While these highly interrelated smart and connected health technologies cannot resolve the pandemic overnight and may not be the only answer to the crisis, they can provide greater insight into the disease and support frontline efforts to prevent and control the pandemic. This article provides a blend of discussions on the contribution of these digital technologies, propose several complementary and multidisciplinary techniques to combat COVID-19, offer opportunities for more holistic studies, and accelerate knowledge acquisition and scientific discoveries in pandemic research. First, four areas, where IoT can contribute are discussed, namely: 1) tracking and tracing; 2) remote patient monitoring (RPM) by wearable IoT (WIoT); 3) personal digital twins (PDTs); and 4) real-life use case: ICT/IoT solution in South Korea. Second, the role and novel applications of AI are explained, namely: 1) diagnosis and prognosis; 2) risk prediction; 3) vaccine and drug development; 4) research data set; 5) early warnings and alerts; 6) social control and fake news detection; and 7) communication and chatbot. Third, the main uses of robotics and drone technology are analyzed, including: 1) crowd surveillance; 2) public announcements; 3) screening and diagnosis; and 4) essential supply delivery. Finally, we discuss how distributed ledger technologies (DLTs), of which blockchain is a common example, can be combined with other technologies for tackling COVID-19. Farshad Firouzi, Bahareh J. Farahani, Mahmoud Daneshmand, Kathy Grise, Jaeseung Song, Roberto Saracco, Lucy Lu Wang, Kyle Lo, Plamen Angelov 0001, Eduardo A. Soares 0001, Po-Shen Loh, Zeynab Talebpour, Reza Moradi, Mohsen Goodarzi, Haleh Ashraf, Mohammad Talebpour, Alireza Talebpour, Luca Romeo, Rupam Das, Hadi Heidari, Dana K. Pasquale, James Moody, Chris Woods, Erich Huang, Payam M. Barnaghi, Majid Sarrafzadeh, Ron C. Li, Kristen L. Beck, Olexandr Isayev, NakMyoung Sung |
IEEE Internet Things J. | 29 |
| 2019 | Inter-Modular Linkers play a crucial role in governing the biosynthesis of non-ribosomal peptidesabstractMOTIVATION: Non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs) are modular enzymatic machines that catalyze the ribosome-independent production of structurally complex small peptides, many of which have important clinical applications as antibiotics, antifungals and anti-cancer agents. Several groups have tried to expand natural product diversity by intermixing different NRPS modules to create synthetic peptides. This approach has not been as successful as anticipated, suggesting that these modules are not fully interchangeable. RESULTS: We explored whether Inter-Modular Linkers (IMLs) impact the ability of NRPS modules to communicate during the synthesis of NRPs. We developed a parser to extract 39 804 IMLs from both well annotated and putative NRPS biosynthetic gene clusters from 39 232 bacterial genomes and established the first IMLs database. We analyzed these IMLs and identified a striking relationship between IMLs and the amino acid substrates of their adjacent modules. More than 92% of the identified IMLs connect modules that activate a particular pair of substrates, suggesting that significant specificity is embedded within these sequences. We therefore propose that incorporating the correct IML is critical when attempting combinatorial biosynthesis of novel NRPS. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The IMLs database as well as the NRPS-Parser have been made available on the web at https://nrps-linker.unc.edu. The entire source code of the project is hosted in GitHub repository (https://github.com/SWFarag/nrps-linker). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Sherif Farag, Rachel M. Bleich, Elizabeth A. Shank, Olexandr Isayev, Albert A. Bowers, Alexander Tropsha |
Bioinform. | 4 |