Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Joseph Ross

dblp:34/5349 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data stream processing · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Geometric modeling and processing · 57% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 22% Image and video processing · 22%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data stream processing
quantile estimation
0.512021
Theory meets Practice at the Median: A Worst Case Comparison of Relative Error Quantile Algorithms · KDD 2021
Algorithms and data structures › data streams
streaming algorithms
0.512021
Theory meets Practice at the Median: A Worst Case Comparison of Relative Error Quantile Algorithms · KDD 2021
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › image analysis › visual inspection
automated visual inspection
0.011998
Exhaustive Detection of Manufacturing Flaws as Abnormalities · CVPR 1998
Image and video processing › pattern detection › anomaly detection
defect detection
0.011998
Exhaustive Detection of Manufacturing Flaws as Abnormalities · CVPR 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

worst-case analysis · 1.0subpixel alignment · 0.0local deformation compensation · 0.0bimodal distribution estimation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Theory meets Practice at the Median: A Worst Case Comparison of Relative Error Quantile Algorithms
abstract
Estimating the distribution and quantiles of data is a foundational task in data mining and data science. We study algorithms which provide accurate results for extreme quantile queries using a small amount of space, thus helping to understand the tails of the input distribution. Namely, we focus on two recent state-of-the-art solutions: t-digest and ReqSketch. While t-digest is a popular compact summary which works well in a variety of settings, ReqSketch comes with formal accuracy guarantees at the cost of its size growing as new observations are inserted. In this work, we provide insight into which conditions make one preferable to the other. Namely, we show how to construct inputs for t-digest that induce an almost arbitrarily large error and demonstrate that it fails to provide accurate results even on i.i.d. samples from a highly non-uniform distribution. We propose practical improvements to ReqSketch, making it faster than t-digest, while its error stays bounded on any instance. Still, our results confirm that t-digest remains more accurate on the "non-adversarial" data encountered in practice.
Graham Cormode, Abhinav Mishra, Joseph Ross, Pavel Veselý 0001
KDD3
2005 Admissible transformation volume for part dimensional quality gauging
Xiaoping Qian, Dean M. Robinson, Joseph Ross
Comput. Aided Des.3
1998 Exhaustive Detection of Manufacturing Flaws as Abnormalities
abstract
Manufacturing flaws of all types, shapes, and sizes can be exhaustively detected as abnormal pixels, if process and noise variations can be learned at every pixel in the inspection area. This statistical template approach to automated visual inspection is extremely fast, effective, and flexible, while achieving false negative rate <10/sup -6/. Critical to this approach are the following novel features: 1) represent both geometry and process information in a model template; 2) align 3D surfaces with subpixel accuracy; compensate for local deformation and texture; 4) estimate bimodal distribution robustly. This novel paradigm was applied to the automatic screening of X-ray images of turbine blades. It has been validated with over 50,000 images and shown to outperform regular inspectors looking at high-pass filtered images.
Van-Duc Nguyen, J. Alison Noble, Joseph L. Mundy, John Janning, Joseph Ross
CVPR5