Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael F. Berger
dblp:34/5888
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0002-0760-7177ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics › RNA-seq analysis
fusion transcript detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | PRADA: pipeline for RNA sequencing data analysis · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics › transcriptome sequencing
RNA sequencing analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | PRADA: pipeline for RNA sequencing data analysis · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
transcription factor binding |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Predicting the binding preference of transcription factors to individual DNA k-mers · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
microarray design |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Design of Compact, Universal DNA Microarrays for Protein Binding Microarray Experiments · RECOMB 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene expression quantification |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | PRADA: pipeline for RNA sequencing data analysis · Bioinform. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
dual-mapping strategy · 0.2statistical inference · 0.1nearest neighbour · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | MPath - Results Manager, a comprehensive solution to store, review and manage genomic variants from NGS-based clinical tests
Aijazuddin Syed, Anoop Balakrishnan, Aaron Dack, John Ziegler, Shruti H. Madur, Jack Birnbaum, Jason Hwee, Meera Prasad, Mustafa Syed, Mohammad Haque, Zhen Y. Liu, Sumit Middha, Ryan Ptashkin, Gowtham Jayakumaran, Rana Satshil, Anita Bowman, Yun-Te Lin, Angela R. Brannon, Michael F. Berger, Ahmet Zehir |
AMIA | 19 |
| 2014 | PRADA: pipeline for RNA sequencing data analysisabstractSUMMARY: Technological advances in high-throughput sequencing necessitate improved computational tools for processing and analyzing large-scale datasets in a systematic automated manner. For that purpose, we have developed PRADA (Pipeline for RNA-Sequencing Data Analysis), a flexible, modular and highly scalable software platform that provides many different types of information available by multifaceted analysis starting from raw paired-end RNA-seq data: gene expression levels, quality metrics, detection of unsupervised and supervised fusion transcripts, detection of intragenic fusion variants, homology scores and fusion frame classification. PRADA uses a dual-mapping strategy that increases sensitivity and refines the analytical endpoints. PRADA has been used extensively and successfully in the glioblastoma and renal clear cell projects of The Cancer Genome Atlas program. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://sourceforge.net/projects/prada/ CONTACT: [email protected] or [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Wandaliz Torres-García, Siyuan Zheng, Andrey Sivachenko, Rahulsimham Vegesna, Qianghu Wang, Rong Yao, Michael F. Berger, John N. Weinstein, Gad Getz, Roel G. W. Verhaak |
Bioinform. | 7 |
| 2009 | Predicting the binding preference of transcription factors to individual DNA k-mersabstractMOTIVATION: Recognition of specific DNA sequences is a central mechanism by which transcription factors (TFs) control gene expression. Many TF-binding preferences, however, are unknown or poorly characterized, in part due to the difficulty associated with determining their specificity experimentally, and an incomplete understanding of the mechanisms governing sequence specificity. New techniques that estimate the affinity of TFs to all possible k-mers provide a new opportunity to study DNA-protein interaction mechanisms, and may facilitate inference of binding preferences for members of a given TF family when such information is available for other family members. RESULTS: We employed a new dataset consisting of the relative preferences of mouse homeodomains for all eight-base DNA sequences in order to ask how well we can predict the binding profiles of homeodomains when only their protein sequences are given. We evaluated a panel of standard statistical inference techniques, as well as variations of the protein features considered. Nearest neighbour among functionally important residues emerged among the most effective methods. Our results underscore the complexity of TF-DNA recognition, and suggest a rational approach for future analyses of TF families. Trevis M. Alleyne, Lourdes Peña Castillo, Gwenael Badis, Shaheynoor Talukder, Michael F. Berger, Andrew R. Gehrke, Anthony A. Philippakis, Martha L. Bulyk, Quaid Morris, Timothy R. Hughes |
Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2007 | Design of Compact, Universal DNA Microarrays for Protein Binding Microarray Experiments
Anthony A. Philippakis, Aaron M. Qureshi, Michael F. Berger, Martha L. Bulyk |
RECOMB | 3 |