Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Donovan H. Parks

dblp:34/6565 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-6662-9010ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 6 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
microbial genomics
1.022022
GTDB-Tk v2: memory friendly classification with the genome taxonomy database · Bioinform. 2022
GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metagenomics
taxonomic classification
1.022022
GTDB-Tk v2: memory friendly classification with the genome taxonomy database · Bioinform. 2022
GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology
metagenomics
0.642022
STAMP: statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles · Bioinform. 2014
GTDB-Tk v2: memory friendly classification with the genome taxonomy database · Bioinform. 2022
GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metagenomics
taxonomic and functional profiling
0.322014
STAMP: statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles · Bioinform. 2014
Identifying biologically relevant differences between metagenomic communities · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metagenomics
comparative metagenomics
0.112010
Identifying biologically relevant differences between metagenomic communities · Bioinform. 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

phylogenetic placement · 1.0divide-and-conquer · 0.6statistical hypothesis testing · 0.3effect size estimation · 0.3confidence intervals · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 AnnoView enables large-scale analysis, comparison, and visualization of microbial gene neighborhoods
abstract
The analysis and comparison of gene neighborhoods is a powerful approach for exploring microbial genome structure, function, and evolution. Although numerous tools exist for genome visualization and comparison, genome exploration across large genomic databases or user-generated datasets remains a challenge. Here, we introduce AnnoView, a web server designed for interactive exploration of gene neighborhoods across the bacterial and archaeal tree of life. Our server offers users the ability to identify, compare, and visualize gene neighborhoods of interest from 30 238 bacterial genomes and 1672 archaeal genomes, through integration with the comprehensive Genome Taxonomy Database and AnnoTree databases. Identified gene neighborhoods can be visualized using pre-computed functional annotations from different sources such as KEGG, Pfam and TIGRFAM, or clustered based on similarity. Alternatively, users can upload and explore their own custom genomic datasets in GBK, GFF or CSV format, or use AnnoView as a genome browser for relatively small genomes (e.g. viruses and plasmids). Ultimately, we anticipate that AnnoView will catalyze biological discovery by enabling user-friendly search, comparison, and visualization of genomic data. AnnoView is available at http://annoview.uwaterloo.ca.
Huagang Tan, Briallen Lobb, William Zhen, Donovan H. Parks, Josh D. Neufeld, Gabriel Moreno-Hagelsieb, Andrew C. Doxey
Briefings Bioinform.6
2022 GTDB-Tk v2: memory friendly classification with the genome taxonomy database
abstract
SUMMARY: The Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) and associated taxonomic classification toolkit (GTDB-Tk) have been widely adopted by the microbiology community. However, the growing size of the GTDB bacterial reference tree has resulted in GTDB-Tk requiring substantial amounts of memory (∼320 GB) which limits its adoption and ease of use. Here, we present an update to GTDB-Tk that uses a divide-and-conquer approach where user genomes are initially placed into a bacterial reference tree with family-level representatives followed by placement into an appropriate class-level subtree comprising species representatives. This substantially reduces the memory requirements of GTDB-Tk while having minimal impact on classification. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: GTDB-Tk is implemented in Python and licenced under the GNU General Public Licence v3.0. Source code and documentation are available at: https://github.com/ecogenomics/gtdbtk. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Pierre-Alain Chaumeil, Aaron J. Mussig, Philip Hugenholtz, Donovan H. Parks
Bioinform.4
2020 GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database
abstract
SUMMARY: The GTDB Toolkit (GTDB-Tk) provides objective taxonomic assignments for bacterial and archaeal genomes based on the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB). GTDB-Tk is computationally efficient and able to classify thousands of draft genomes in parallel. Here we demonstrate the accuracy of the GTDB-Tk taxonomic assignments by evaluating its performance on a phylogenetically diverse set of 10,156 bacterial and archaeal metagenome-assembled genomes. AVAILABILITY: GTDB-Tk is implemented in Python and licensed under the GNU General Public License v3.0. Source code and documentation are available at: https://github.com/ecogenomics/gtdbtk. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Pierre-Alain Chaumeil, Aaron J. Mussig, Philip Hugenholtz, Donovan H. Parks
Bioinform.4
2014 STAMP: statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles
abstract
UNLABELLED: STAMP is a graphical software package that provides statistical hypothesis tests and exploratory plots for analysing taxonomic and functional profiles. It supports tests for comparing pairs of samples or samples organized into two or more treatment groups. Effect sizes and confidence intervals are provided to allow critical assessment of the biological relevancy of test results. A user-friendly graphical interface permits easy exploration of statistical results and generation of publication-quality plots. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: STAMP is licensed under the GNU GPL. Python source code and binaries are available from our website at: http://kiwi.cs.dal.ca/Software/STAMP.
Donovan H. Parks, Gene W. Tyson, Philip Hugenholtz, Robert G. Beiko
Bioinform.1
2011 Classifying short genomic fragments from novel lineages using composition and homology
abstract
BACKGROUND: The assignment of taxonomic attributions to DNA fragments recovered directly from the environment is a vital step in metagenomic data analysis. Assignments can be made using rank-specific classifiers, which assign reads to taxonomic labels from a predetermined level such as named species or strain, or rank-flexible classifiers, which choose an appropriate taxonomic rank for each sequence in a data set. The choice of rank typically depends on the optimal model for a given sequence and on the breadth of taxonomic groups seen in a set of close-to-optimal models. Homology-based (e.g., LCA) and composition-based (e.g., PhyloPythia, TACOA) rank-flexible classifiers have been proposed, but there is at present no hybrid approach that utilizes both homology and composition. RESULTS: We first develop a hybrid, rank-specific classifier based on BLAST and Naïve Bayes (NB) that has comparable accuracy and a faster running time than the current best approach, PhymmBL. By substituting LCA for BLAST or allowing the inclusion of suboptimal NB models, we obtain a rank-flexible classifier. This hybrid classifier outperforms established rank-flexible approaches on simulated metagenomic fragments of length 200 bp to 1000 bp and is able to assign taxonomic attributions to a subset of sequences with few misclassifications. We then demonstrate the performance of different classifiers on an enhanced biological phosphorous removal metagenome, illustrating the advantages of rank-flexible classifiers when representative genomes are absent from the set of reference genomes. Application to a glacier ice metagenome demonstrates that similar taxonomic profiles are obtained across a set of classifiers which are increasingly conservative in their classification. CONCLUSIONS: Our NB-based classification scheme is faster than the current best composition-based algorithm, Phymm, while providing equally accurate predictions. The rank-flexible variant of NB, which we term ε-NB, is complementary to LCA and can be combined with it to yield conservative prediction sets of very high confidence. The simple parameterization of LCA and ε-NB allows for tuning of the balance between more predictions and increased precision, allowing the user to account for the sensitivity of downstream analyses to misclassified or unclassified sequences.
Donovan H. Parks, Norman J. MacDonald, Robert G. Beiko
BMC Bioinform.1
2010 Identifying biologically relevant differences between metagenomic communities
abstract
MOTIVATION: Metagenomics is the study of genetic material recovered directly from environmental samples. Taxonomic and functional differences between metagenomic samples can highlight the influence of ecological factors on patterns of microbial life in a wide range of habitats. Statistical hypothesis tests can help us distinguish ecological influences from sampling artifacts, but knowledge of only the P-value from a statistical hypothesis test is insufficient to make inferences about biological relevance. Current reporting practices for pairwise comparative metagenomics are inadequate, and better tools are needed for comparative metagenomic analysis. RESULTS: We have developed a new software package, STAMP, for comparative metagenomics that supports best practices in analysis and reporting. Examination of a pair of iron mine metagenomes demonstrates that deeper biological insights can be gained using statistical techniques available in our software. An analysis of the functional potential of 'Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis' in two enhanced biological phosphorus removal metagenomes identified several subsystems that differ between the A.phosphatis stains in these related communities, including phosphate metabolism, secretion and metal transport. AVAILABILITY: Python source code and binaries are freely available from our website at http://kiwi.cs.dal.ca/Software/STAMP CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Donovan H. Parks, Robert G. Beiko
Bioinform.1
2010 Is local colour normalization good enough for local appearance-based classification?
Donovan H. Parks, Martin D. Levine
Mach. Vis. Appl.1
2008 Evaluation of Background Subtraction Algorithms with Post-Processing
abstract
Processing a video stream to segment foreground objects from the background is a critical first step in many computer vision applications. Background subtraction (BGS) is a commonly used technique for achieving this segmentation. The popularity of BGS largely comes from its computational efficiency, which allows applications such as human-computer interaction, video surveillance, and traffic monitoring to meet their real-time goals. Numerous BGS algorithms and a number of post-processing techniques that aim to improve the results of these algorithms have been proposed. In this paper, we evaluate several popular, state-of-the-art BGS algorithms and examine how post-processing techniques affect their performance. Our experimental results demonstrate that post-processing techniques can significantly improve the foreground segmentation masks produced by a BGS algorithm. We provide recommendations for achieving robust foreground segmentation based on the lessons learned performing this comparative study.
Donovan H. Parks, Sidney S. Fels
AVSS1