The development and validation of Clinical Decision Support Models (CDSM) based on Bayesian networks (BN) is commonly done in a collaborative work between medical researchers providing the domain expertise and computer scientists developing the decision support model. Although modern tools provide facilities for data-driven model generation, domain experts are required to validate the accuracy of the learned model and to provide expert knowledge for fine-tuning it while computer scientists are needed to integrate this knowledge in the learned model (hybrid modeling approach). This generally time-expensive procedure hampers CDSM generation and updating. To address this problem, we developed a novel interactive visual approach allowing medical researchers with less knowledge in CDSM to develop and validate BNs based on domain specific data mainly independently and thus, diminishing the need for an additional computer scientist. In this context, we abstracted and simplified the common workflow in BN development as well as adjusted the workflow to medical experts' needs. We demonstrate our visual approach with data of endometrial cancer patients and evaluated it with six medical researchers who are domain experts in the gynecological field.

The identification of interesting patterns and relationships is essential to exploratory data analysis. This becomes increasingly difficult in high dimensional datasets. While dimensionality reduction techniques can be utilized to reduce the analysis space, these may unintentionally bury key dimensions within a larger grouping and obfuscate meaningful patterns. With this work we introduce DimLift, a novel visual analysis method for creating and interacting with dimensional bundles. Generated through an iterative dimensionality reduction or user-driven approach, dimensional bundles are expressive groups of dimensions that contribute similarly to the variance of a dataset. Interactive exploration and reconstruction methods via a layered parallel coordinates plot allow users to lift interesting and subtle relationships to the surface, even in complex scenarios of missing and mixed data types. We exemplify the power of this technique in an expert case study on clinical cohort data alongside two additional case examples from nutrition and ecology.

The Dual Analysis framework is a powerful enabling technology for the exploration of high dimensional quantitative data by treating data dimensions as first-class objects that can be explored in tandem with data values. In this article, we extend the Dual Analysis framework through the joint treatment of quantitative (numerical) and qualitative (categorical) dimensions. Computing common measures for all dimensions allows us to visualize both quantitative and qualitative dimensions in the same view. This enables a natural joint treatment of mixed data during interactive visual exploration and analysis. Several measures of variation for nominal qualitative data can also be applied to ordinal qualitative and quantitative data. For example, instead of measuring variability from a mean or median, other measures assess inter-data variation or average variation from a mode. In this work, we demonstrate how these measures can be integrated into the Dual Analysis framework to explore and generate hypotheses about high-dimensional mixed data. A medical case study using clinical routine data of patients suffering from Cerebral Small Vessel Disease (CSVD), conducted with a senior neurologist and a medical student, shows that a joint Dual Analysis approach for quantitative and qualitative data can rapidly lead to new insights based on which new hypotheses may be generated.