*Policy gradient* (PG) methods are effective *reinforcement learning* (RL) approaches, particularly for continuous problems. While they optimize stochastic (hyper)policies via action- or parameter-space exploration, real-world applications often require deterministic policies. Existing PG convergence guarantees to deterministic policies assume a fixed stochasticity in the (hyper)policy, tuned according to the desired final suboptimality, whereas practitioners commonly use a dynamic stochasticity level. This work provides the theoretical foundations for this practice. We introduce PES, a phase-based method that reduces stochasticity via a deterministic schedule while running PG subroutines with fixed stochasticity in each phase. Under gradient domination assumptions, PES achieves last-iterate convergence to the optimal deterministic policy with a sample complexity of order $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\epsilon^{-5})$. Additionally, we analyze the common practice, termed SL-PG, of jointly learning stochasticity (via an appropriate parameterization) and (hyper)policy parameters. We show that SL-PG also ensures last-iterate convergence with a rate $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\epsilon^{-3})$, but to the optimal stochastic (hyper)policy only, requiring stronger assumptions compared to PES.

Policy gradient (PG) methods are successful approaches to deal with continuous reinforcement learning (RL) problems. They learn stochastic parametric (hyper)policies by either exploring in the space of actions or in the space of parameters. Stochastic controllers, however, are often undesirable from a practical perspective because of their lack of robustness, safety, and traceability. In common practice, stochastic (hyper)policies are learned only to deploy their deterministic version. In this paper, we make a step towards the theoretical understanding of this practice. After introducing a novel framework for modeling this scenario, we study the global convergence to the best deterministic policy, under (weak) gradient domination assumptions. Then, we illustrate how to tune the exploration level used for learning to optimize the trade-off between the sample complexity and the performance of the deployed deterministic policy. Finally, we quantitatively compare action-based and parameter-based exploration, giving a formal guise to intuitive results.

Stochastic Rising Bandits (SRBs) model sequential decision-making problems in which the expected reward of the available options increases every time they are selected. This setting captures a wide range of scenarios in which the available options are learning entities whose performance improves (in expectation) over time (e.g., online best model selection). While previous works addressed the regret minimization problem, this paper focuses on the fixed-budget Best Arm Identification (BAI) problem for SRBs. In this scenario, given a fixed budget of rounds, we are asked to provide a recommendation about the best option at the end of the identification process. We propose two algorithms to tackle the above-mentioned setting, namely R-UCBE, which resorts to a UCB-like approach, and R-SR, which employs a successive reject procedure. Then, we prove that, with a sufficiently large budget, they provide guarantees on the probability of properly identifying the optimal option at the end of the learning process and on the simple regret. Furthermore, we derive a lower bound on the error probability, matched by our R-SR (up to constants), and illustrate how the need for a sufficiently large budget is unavoidable in the SRB setting. Finally, we numerically validate the proposed algorithms in both synthetic and realistic environments.

*Constrained Reinforcement Learning* (CRL) tackles sequential decision-making problems where agents are required to achieve goals by maximizing the expected return while meeting domain-specific constraints, which are often formulated on expected costs. In this setting, *policy-based* methods are widely used since they come with several advantages when dealing with continuous-control problems. These methods search in the policy space with an *action-based* or *parameter-based* exploration strategy, depending on whether they learn directly the parameters of a stochastic policy or those of a stochastic hyperpolicy. In this paper, we propose a general framework for addressing CRL problems via *gradient-based primal-dual* algorithms, relying on an alternate ascent/descent scheme with dual-variable regularization. We introduce an exploration-agnostic algorithm, called C-PG, which exhibits global last-iterate convergence guarantees under (weak) gradient domination assumptions, improving and generalizing existing results. Then, we design C-PGAE and C-PGPE, the action-based and the parameter-based versions of C-PG, respectively, and we illustrate how they naturally extend to constraints defined in terms of *risk measures* over the costs, as it is often requested in safety-critical scenarios. Finally, we numerically validate our algorithms on constrained control problems, and compare them with state-of-the-art baselines, demonstrating their effectiveness.