Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alejandro Gonzalez-Garcia
dblp:340/4186
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-5575-0843ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Motion planning and robot control · 64% Legged, aerial and field robots · 36% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
trajectory tracking |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Robust Model Predictive Control with Control Barrier Functions for Autonomous Surface Vessels · ICRA 2024 Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Tracking Control of an Autonomous Surface Vessel in Natural Waters · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › field robotics › maritime robotics
autonomous surface vehicle |
0.9 | 2 | 2024 | Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Tracking Control of an Autonomous Surface Vessel in Natural Waters · ICRA 2023 Robust Model Predictive Control with Control Barrier Functions for Autonomous Surface Vessels · ICRA 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › learning control
deep reinforcement learning control |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Tracking Control of an Autonomous Surface Vessel in Natural Waters · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Tracking Control of an Autonomous Surface Vessel in Natural Waters · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › underwater robotics
underwater vehicle control |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Tracking Control of an Autonomous Surface Vessel in Natural Waters · ICRA 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
model predictive control · 0.8control barrier functions · 0.8reward design · 0.7nonlinear model predictive control · 0.7deep reinforcement learning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Safe Motion Planning and Control Using Predictive and Adaptive Barrier Methods for Autonomous Surface VesselsabstractSafe motion planning is essential for autonomous vessel operations, especially in challenging spaces such as narrow inland waterways. However, conventional motion planning approaches are often computationally intensive or overly conservative. This paper proposes a safe motion planning strategy combining Model Predictive Control (MPC) and Control Barrier Functions (CBFs). We introduce a time-varying inflated ellipse obstacle representation, where the inflation radius is adjusted depending on the relative position and attitude between the vessel and the obstacle. The proposed adaptive inflation reduces the conservativeness of the controller compared to traditional fixed-ellipsoid obstacle formulations. The MPC solution provides an approximate motion plan, and high-order CBFs ensure the vessel’s safety using the varying inflation radius. Simulation and real-world experiments demonstrate that the proposed strategy enables the fully-actuated autonomous robot vessel to navigate through narrow spaces in real time and resolve potential deadlocks, all while ensuring safety. Alejandro Gonzalez-Garcia, Wei Xiao 0003, Wei Wang 0078, Alejandro Astudillo, Wilm Decré, Jan Swevers, Carlo Ratti, Daniela Rus |
IROS | 1 |
| 2024 | Robust Model Predictive Control with Control Barrier Functions for Autonomous Surface VesselsabstractIn autonomous robot navigation, the trajectories from path planners are considered to be safe regions, and deviations could endanger vessels. Model Predictive Control (MPC) stands as a popular choice for trajectory tracking problems as it naturally addresses operational constraints, such as dynamics and control constraints. Nevertheless, achieving robustness in changing environments like oceans and rivers, which are constantly subject to significant external disturbances, remains an ongoing challenge for MPC. It must consistently keep the system within a predefined safe region (such as a reference trajectory) even in the presence of model inaccuracies and perturbations. To address this challenge, we present a robust model predictive control strategy utilizing Control Barrier Functions (CBFs), which increases the disturbance-rejection abilities. We verify our method on an autonomous surface vessel in simulation and natural waters, both with external disturbances. Specifically, compared with the traditional MPC method, our proposed MPC-CBF strategy reduces tracking errors by 17.82% and 40.26% in simulations and field experiments, respectively. Although the control effort slightly increases by 7.78% and 4.20%, respectively, these results clearly demonstrate the enhanced resilience of MPC-CBF to disturbances. Wei Wang 0078, Wei Xiao 0003, Alejandro Gonzalez-Garcia, Jan Swevers, Carlo Ratti, Daniela Rus |
ICRA | 3 |
| 2023 | Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Tracking Control of an Autonomous Surface Vessel in Natural WatersabstractAccurate control of autonomous marine robots still poses challenges due to the complex dynamics of the environment. In this paper, we propose a Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) approach to train a controller for autonomous surface vessel (ASV) trajectory tracking and compare its performance with an advanced nonlinear model predictive controller (NMPC) in real environments. Taking into account environmental disturbances (e.g., wind, waves, and currents), noisy measurements, and non-ideal actuators presented in the physical ASV, several effective reward functions for DRL tracking control policies are carefully designed. The control policies were trained in a simulation environment with diverse tracking trajectories and disturbances. The performance of the DRL controller has been verified and compared with the NMPC in both simulations with model-based environmental disturbances and in natural waters. Simulations show that the DRL controller has 53.33% lower tracking error than that of NMPC. Experimental results further show that, compared to NMPC, the DRL controller has 35.51% lower tracking error, indicating that DRL controllers offer better disturbance rejection in river environments than NMPC. Wei Wang 0078, Xiaojing Cao, Alejandro Gonzalez-Garcia, Lianhao Yin, Niklas Hagemann, Yuanyuan Qiao 0002, Carlo Ratti, Daniela Rus |
ICRA | 3 |