Yecheng Xue

dblp:340/7132 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Algorithms and data structures · 42% Quantum computing and quantum information · 30% Computational complexity · 28%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Emerging computing paradigms · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture
distributed quantum computing
1.012026
DC-MBQC: A Distributed Compilation Framework for Measurement-Based Quantum Computing · HPCA 2026
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture
measurement-based quantum computing
1.012026
DC-MBQC: A Distributed Compilation Framework for Measurement-Based Quantum Computing · HPCA 2026
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture
quantum compilation
1.012026
DC-MBQC: A Distributed Compilation Framework for Measurement-Based Quantum Computing · HPCA 2026
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computer architecture
1.012026
DC-MBQC: A Distributed Compilation Framework for Measurement-Based Quantum Computing · HPCA 2026
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
exploration-exploitation tradeoff
0.812024
Provably Efficient Exploration in Quantum Reinforcement Learning with Logarithmic Worst-Case Regret · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
regret minimization
0.812024
Provably Efficient Exploration in Quantum Reinforcement Learning with Logarithmic Worst-Case Regret · ICML 2024
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum machine learning
quantum reinforcement learning
0.812024
Provably Efficient Exploration in Quantum Reinforcement Learning with Logarithmic Worst-Case Regret · ICML 2024
Algorithms and data structures
clustering
0.712023
Near-Optimal Quantum Coreset Construction Algorithms for Clustering · ICML 2023
Algorithms and data structures › clustering
k-clustering
0.712023
Near-Optimal Quantum Coreset Construction Algorithms for Clustering · ICML 2023
Algorithms and data structures › clustering › center-based clustering
k-median and k-means
0.712023
Near-Optimal Quantum Coreset Construction Algorithms for Clustering · ICML 2023
Computational complexity
lower bounds
0.712023
Near-Optimal Quantum Coreset Construction Algorithms for Clustering · ICML 2023
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum algorithms
0.712023
Near-Optimal Quantum Coreset Construction Algorithms for Clustering · ICML 2023
Computational complexity › query complexity
quantum query complexity
0.712023
Near-Optimal Quantum Coreset Construction Algorithms for Clustering · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process › finite markov decision processes
tabular markov decision process
0.212024
Provably Efficient Exploration in Quantum Reinforcement Learning with Logarithmic Worst-Case Regret · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

value target regression · 1.5quantum estimation · 1.5lazy updating · 1.5UCRL · 1.5layer scheduling · 1.0graph partitioning · 1.0quantum query algorithm · 0.7coreset · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 DC-MBQC: A Distributed Compilation Framework for Measurement-Based Quantum Computing
abstract
Distributed quantum computing (DQC) is a promising technique for scaling up quantum systems. While significant progress has been made in DQC for quantum circuit models, there exists much less research on DQC for measurement-based quantum computing (MBQC), which is a universal quantum computing model that is essentially different from the circuit model and particularly well-suited to photonic quantum platforms. In this paper, we propose DC-MBQC, the first distributed quantum compilation framework tailored for MBQC. We identify and address two key challenges in enabling DQC for MBQC. First, for task allocation among quantum processing units (QPUs), we develop an adaptive graph partitioning algorithm that preserves the structure of the graph state while balancing the workload across QPUs. Second, for inter-QPU communication, we introduce the layer scheduling problem and propose an algorithm to solve it. Regrading realistic hardware requirements, we optimize the execution time of running quantum programs and the corresponding required photon lifetime to avoid fatal failures caused by photon loss. Our experiments demonstrate a$7.46 \times$improvement on required photon lifetime and$6.82 \times$speedup with 8 fully-connected QPUs, which further confirm the advantage of distributed quantum computing in photonic systems.
Yecheng Xue, Zhiding Liang, Tongyang Li
HPCA1
2024 Provably Efficient Exploration in Quantum Reinforcement Learning with Logarithmic Worst-Case Regret
abstract
While quantum reinforcement learning (RL) has attracted a surge of attention recently, its theoretical understanding is limited. In particular, it remains elusive how to design provably efficient quantum RL algorithms that can address the exploration-exploitation trade-off. To this end, we propose a novel UCRL-style algorithm that takes advantage of quantum computing for tabular Markov decision processes (MDPs) with $S$ states, $A$ actions, and horizon $H$, and establish an $\mathcal{O}(\mathrm{poly}(S, A, H, \log T))$ worst-case regret for it, where $T$ is the number of episodes. Furthermore, we extend our results to quantum RL with linear function approximation, which is capable of handling problems with large state spaces. Specifically, we develop a quantum algorithm based on value target regression (VTR) for linear mixture MDPs with $d$-dimensional linear representation and prove that it enjoys $\mathcal{O}(\mathrm{poly}(d, H, \log T))$ regret. Our algorithms are variants of UCRL/UCRL-VTR algorithms in classical RL, which also leverage a novel combination of lazy updating mechanisms and quantum estimation subroutines. This is the key to breaking the $\Omega(\sqrt{T})$-regret barrier in classical RL. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work studying the online exploration in quantum RL with provable logarithmic worst-case regret.
Han Zhong 0001, Jiachen Hu, Yecheng Xue, Tongyang Li, Liwei Wang 0001
ICML3
2023 Near-Optimal Quantum Coreset Construction Algorithms for Clustering
abstract
$k$-Clustering in $\mathbb{R}^d$ (e.g., $k$-median and $k$-means) is a fundamental machine learning problem. While near-linear time approximation algorithms were known in the classical setting for a dataset with cardinality $n$, it remains open to find sublinear-time quantum algorithms. We give quantum algorithms that find coresets for $k$-clustering in $\mathbb{R}^d$ with $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{nk}d^{3/2})$ query complexity. Our coreset reduces the input size from $n$ to $\mathrm{poly}(k\epsilon^{-1}d)$, so that existing $\alpha$-approximation algorithms for clustering can run on top of it and yield $(1 + \epsilon)\alpha$-approximation. This eventually yields a quadratic speedup for various $k$-clustering approximation algorithms. We complement our algorithm with a nearly matching lower bound, that any quantum algorithm must make $\Omega(\sqrt{nk})$ queries in order to achieve even $O(1)$-approximation for $k$-clustering.
Yecheng Xue, Tongyang Li, Shaofeng H.-C. Jiang
ICML1