VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yecheng Xue
dblp:340/7132
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Algorithms and data structures · 42% Quantum computing and quantum information · 30% Computational complexity · 28% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Emerging computing paradigms · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture
distributed quantum computing |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | DC-MBQC: A Distributed Compilation Framework for Measurement-Based Quantum Computing · HPCA 2026 |
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture
measurement-based quantum computing |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | DC-MBQC: A Distributed Compilation Framework for Measurement-Based Quantum Computing · HPCA 2026 |
Emerging computing paradigms › quantum computer architecture
quantum compilation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | DC-MBQC: A Distributed Compilation Framework for Measurement-Based Quantum Computing · HPCA 2026 |
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computer architecture |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | DC-MBQC: A Distributed Compilation Framework for Measurement-Based Quantum Computing · HPCA 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
exploration-exploitation tradeoff |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Provably Efficient Exploration in Quantum Reinforcement Learning with Logarithmic Worst-Case Regret · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
regret minimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Provably Efficient Exploration in Quantum Reinforcement Learning with Logarithmic Worst-Case Regret · ICML 2024 |
Quantum computing and quantum information › quantum machine learning
quantum reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Provably Efficient Exploration in Quantum Reinforcement Learning with Logarithmic Worst-Case Regret · ICML 2024 |
Algorithms and data structures
clustering |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Near-Optimal Quantum Coreset Construction Algorithms for Clustering · ICML 2023 |
Algorithms and data structures › clustering
k-clustering |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Near-Optimal Quantum Coreset Construction Algorithms for Clustering · ICML 2023 |
Algorithms and data structures › clustering › center-based clustering
k-median and k-means |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Near-Optimal Quantum Coreset Construction Algorithms for Clustering · ICML 2023 |
Computational complexity
lower bounds |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Near-Optimal Quantum Coreset Construction Algorithms for Clustering · ICML 2023 |
Quantum computing and quantum information
quantum algorithms |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Near-Optimal Quantum Coreset Construction Algorithms for Clustering · ICML 2023 |
Computational complexity › query complexity
quantum query complexity |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Near-Optimal Quantum Coreset Construction Algorithms for Clustering · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process › finite markov decision processes
tabular markov decision process |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Provably Efficient Exploration in Quantum Reinforcement Learning with Logarithmic Worst-Case Regret · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
value target regression · 1.5quantum estimation · 1.5lazy updating · 1.5UCRL · 1.5layer scheduling · 1.0graph partitioning · 1.0quantum query algorithm · 0.7coreset · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | DC-MBQC: A Distributed Compilation Framework for Measurement-Based Quantum ComputingabstractDistributed quantum computing (DQC) is a promising technique for scaling up quantum systems. While significant progress has been made in DQC for quantum circuit models, there exists much less research on DQC for measurement-based quantum computing (MBQC), which is a universal quantum computing model that is essentially different from the circuit model and particularly well-suited to photonic quantum platforms. In this paper, we propose DC-MBQC, the first distributed quantum compilation framework tailored for MBQC. We identify and address two key challenges in enabling DQC for MBQC. First, for task allocation among quantum processing units (QPUs), we develop an adaptive graph partitioning algorithm that preserves the structure of the graph state while balancing the workload across QPUs. Second, for inter-QPU communication, we introduce the layer scheduling problem and propose an algorithm to solve it. Regrading realistic hardware requirements, we optimize the execution time of running quantum programs and the corresponding required photon lifetime to avoid fatal failures caused by photon loss. Our experiments demonstrate a$7.46 \times$improvement on required photon lifetime and$6.82 \times$speedup with 8 fully-connected QPUs, which further confirm the advantage of distributed quantum computing in photonic systems. Yecheng Xue, Zhiding Liang, Tongyang Li |
HPCA | 1 |
| 2024 | Provably Efficient Exploration in Quantum Reinforcement Learning with Logarithmic Worst-Case RegretabstractWhile quantum reinforcement learning (RL) has attracted a surge of attention recently, its theoretical understanding is limited. In particular, it remains elusive how to design provably efficient quantum RL algorithms that can address the exploration-exploitation trade-off. To this end, we propose a novel UCRL-style algorithm that takes advantage of quantum computing for tabular Markov decision processes (MDPs) with $S$ states, $A$ actions, and horizon $H$, and establish an $\mathcal{O}(\mathrm{poly}(S, A, H, \log T))$ worst-case regret for it, where $T$ is the number of episodes. Furthermore, we extend our results to quantum RL with linear function approximation, which is capable of handling problems with large state spaces. Specifically, we develop a quantum algorithm based on value target regression (VTR) for linear mixture MDPs with $d$-dimensional linear representation and prove that it enjoys $\mathcal{O}(\mathrm{poly}(d, H, \log T))$ regret. Our algorithms are variants of UCRL/UCRL-VTR algorithms in classical RL, which also leverage a novel combination of lazy updating mechanisms and quantum estimation subroutines. This is the key to breaking the $\Omega(\sqrt{T})$-regret barrier in classical RL. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work studying the online exploration in quantum RL with provable logarithmic worst-case regret. Han Zhong 0001, Jiachen Hu, Yecheng Xue, Tongyang Li, Liwei Wang 0001 |
ICML | 3 |
| 2023 | Near-Optimal Quantum Coreset Construction Algorithms for Clusteringabstract$k$-Clustering in $\mathbb{R}^d$ (e.g., $k$-median and $k$-means) is a fundamental machine learning problem. While near-linear time approximation algorithms were known in the classical setting for a dataset with cardinality $n$, it remains open to find sublinear-time quantum algorithms. We give quantum algorithms that find coresets for $k$-clustering in $\mathbb{R}^d$ with $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{nk}d^{3/2})$ query complexity. Our coreset reduces the input size from $n$ to $\mathrm{poly}(k\epsilon^{-1}d)$, so that existing $\alpha$-approximation algorithms for clustering can run on top of it and yield $(1 + \epsilon)\alpha$-approximation. This eventually yields a quadratic speedup for various $k$-clustering approximation algorithms. We complement our algorithm with a nearly matching lower bound, that any quantum algorithm must make $\Omega(\sqrt{nk})$ queries in order to achieve even $O(1)$-approximation for $k$-clustering. Yecheng Xue, Tongyang Li, Shaofeng H.-C. Jiang |
ICML | 1 |