We present an ongoing effort to build a framework and a library in Isabelle/HOL for formalising primal-dual arguments for the analysis of algorithms. We discuss a number of example formalisations from the theory of matching algorithms, covering classical algorithms like the Hungarian Method, widely considered the first primal-dual algorithm, and modern algorithms like the AdWords algorithm, which models the assignment of search queries to advertisers in the context of search engines.

We describe a formal correctness proof of RANKING, an online algorithm for online bipartite matching. An outcome of our formalisation is that it shows that there is a gap in all combinatorial proofs of the algorithm. Filling that gap constituted the majority of the effort which went into this work. This is despite the algorithm being one of the most studied algorithms and a central result in theoretical computer science. This gap is an example of difficulties in formalising graphical arguments which are ubiquitous in the theory of computing.