Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sunrui Lu

dblp:341/3673 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Question answering and dialogue systems · 77% Language models and text generation · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › dialogue generation
knowledge-grounded dialogue generation
0.712023
GLM-Dialog: Noise-tolerant Pre-training for Knowledge-grounded Dialogue Generation · KDD 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.212023
GLM-Dialog: Noise-tolerant Pre-training for Knowledge-grounded Dialogue Generation · KDD 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

retrieval from search engine · 0.7pre-training · 0.7large language model · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 GLM-Dialog: Noise-tolerant Pre-training for Knowledge-grounded Dialogue Generation
abstract
We present GLM-Dialog, a large-scale language model (LLM) with 10B parameters capable of knowledge-grounded conversation in Chinese using a search engine to access the Internet knowledge. GLM-Dialog offers a series of applicable techniques for exploiting various external knowledge including both helpful and noisy knowledge, enabling the creation of robust knowledge-grounded dialogue LLMs with limited proper datasets. To evaluate the GLM-Dialog more fairly, we also propose a novel evaluation method to allow humans to converse with multiple deployed bots simultaneously and compare their performance implicitly instead of explicitly rating using multidimensional metrics. Comprehensive evaluations from automatic to human perspective demonstrate the advantages of GLM-Dialog comparing with existing open source Chinese dialogue models. We release both the model checkpoint and source code, and also deploy it as a WeChat application to interact with users. We offer our evaluation platform online in an effort to prompt the development of open source models and reliable dialogue evaluation systems. All the source code is available on Github.
Jing Zhang 0001, Daniel Zhang-Li, Jifan Yu, Zijun Yao 0002, Zeyao Ma, Yiqi Xu, Nianyi Lin, Sunrui Lu, Juan-Zi Li, Jie Tang 0001
KDD11