VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vighnesh Subramaniam
dblp:341/3754
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 36% Language models and text generation · 12% Multi-agent systems · 12% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 79% Medical and health informatics · 21% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience
neuroinformatics |
1.5 | 2 | 2024 | Brain Treebank: Large-scale intracranial recordings from naturalistic language stimuli · NeurIPS 2024 Revealing Vision-Language Integration in the Brain with Multimodal Networks · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation matching
feature alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Training the Untrainable: Introducing Inductive Bias via Representational Alignment · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
inductive bias |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Training the Untrainable: Introducing Inductive Bias via Representational Alignment · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
knowledge transfer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Training the Untrainable: Introducing Inductive Bias via Representational Alignment · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
self-supervised representation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Population Transformer: Learning Population-level Representations of Neural Activity · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › computational neuroscience › neural coding
brain encoding models |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Revealing Vision-Language Integration in the Brain with Multimodal Networks · ICML 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Brain Treebank: Large-scale intracranial recordings from naturalistic language stimuli · NeurIPS 2024 |
Medical and health informatics
brain-computer interface |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | BrainBERT: Self-supervised representation learning for intracranial recordings · ICLR 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
neural signal processing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | BrainBERT: Self-supervised representation learning for intracranial recordings · ICLR 2023 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Training the Untrainable: Introducing Inductive Bias via Representational Alignment · NeurIPS 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
neural decoding |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Population Transformer: Learning Population-level Representations of Neural Activity · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 3.1self-supervised pretraining · 1.7stereoencephalography · 1.5cross-attention · 1.5contrastive learning · 1.5synthetic data generation · 0.9neural distance function · 0.9layerwise representational similarity · 0.9knowledge distillation · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9intracranial electrophysiology · 0.8dependency parsing · 0.8self-supervised representation learning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Population Transformer: Learning Population-level Representations of Neural ActivityabstractWe present a self-supervised framework that learns population-level codes for arbitrary ensembles of neural recordings at scale. We address key challenges in scaling models with neural time-series data, namely, sparse and variable electrode distribution across subjects and datasets. The Population Transformer (PopT) stacks on top of pretrained temporal embeddings and enhances downstream decoding by enabling learned aggregation of multiple spatially-sparse data channels. The pretrained PopT lowers the amount of data required for downstream decoding experiments, while increasing accuracy, even on held-out subjects and tasks. Compared to end-to-end methods, this approach is computationally lightweight, while achieving similar or better decoding performance. We further show how our framework is generalizable to multiple time-series embeddings and neural data modalities. Beyond decoding, we interpret the pretrained and fine-tuned PopT models to show how they can be used to extract neuroscience insights from large amounts of data. We release our code as well as a pretrained PopT to enable off-the-shelf improvements in multi-channel intracranial data decoding and interpretability. Code is available at https://github.com/czlwang/PopulationTransformer. Geeling Chau, Christopher Wang, Sabera Talukder, Vighnesh Subramaniam, Saraswati Soedarmadji, Yisong Yue, Boris Katz, Andrei Barbu |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2025 | Multiagent Finetuning: Self Improvement with Diverse Reasoning ChainsabstractLarge language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance in recent years but are fundamentally limited by the underlying training data. To improve models beyond the training data, recent works have explored how LLMs can be used to generate synthetic data for autonomous self-improvement. However, successive steps of self-improvement can reach a point of diminishing returns. In this work, we propose a complementary approach towards self-improvement where finetuning is applied to a multiagent society of language models. A group of language models, all starting from the same base model, are independently specialized by updating each one using data generated through multiagent interactions among the models. By training each model on independent sets of data, we illustrate how this approach enables specialization across models and diversification over the set of models. As a result, our overall system is able to preserve diverse reasoning chains and autonomously improve over many more rounds of fine-tuning than single-agent self-improvement methods. We quantitatively illustrate the efficacy of the approach across a wide suite of reasoning tasks. Vighnesh Subramaniam, Yilun Du, Josh Tenenbaum, Antonio Torralba 0001, Shuang Li 0013, Igor Mordatch |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | Training the Untrainable: Introducing Inductive Bias via Representational AlignmentabstractWe demonstrate that architectures which traditionally are considered to be ill-suited for a task can be trained using inductive biases from another architecture. We call a network untrainable when it overfits, underfits, or converges to poor results even when tuning their hyperparameters. For example, fully connected networks overfit on object recognition while deep convolutional networks without residual connections underfit. The traditional answer is to change the architecture to impose some inductive bias, although the nature of that bias is unknown. We introduce guidance, where a guide network steers a target network using a neural distance function. The target minimizes its task loss plus a layerwise representational similarity against the frozen guide. If the guide is trained, this transfers over the architectural prior and knowledge of the guide to the target. If the guide is untrained, this transfers over only part of the architectural prior of the guide. We show that guidance prevents FCN overfitting on ImageNet, narrows the vanilla RNN–Transformer gap, boosts plain CNNs toward ResNet accuracy, and aids Transformers on RNN-favored tasks. We further identify that guidance-driven initialization alone can mitigate FCN overfitting. Our method provides a mathematical tool to investigate priors and architectures, and in the long term, could automate architecture design. Vighnesh Subramaniam, David Mayo, Colin Conwell, Tomaso A. Poggio, Boris Katz, Brian Cheung, Andrei Barbu |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Revealing Vision-Language Integration in the Brain with Multimodal NetworksabstractWe use (multi)modal deep neural networks (DNNs) to probe for sites of multimodal integration in the human brain by predicting stereoencephalography (SEEG) recordings taken while human subjects watched movies. We operationalize sites of multimodal integration as regions where a multimodal vision-language model predicts recordings better than unimodal language, unimodal vision, or linearly-integrated language-vision models. Our target DNN models span different architectures (e.g., convolutional networks and transformers) and multimodal training techniques (e.g., cross-attention and contrastive learning). As a key enabling step, we first demonstrate that trained vision and language models systematically outperform their randomly initialized counterparts in their ability to predict SEEG signals. We then compare unimodal and multimodal models against one another. Because our target DNN models often have different architectures, number of parameters, and training sets (possibly obscuring those differences attributable to integration), we carry out a controlled comparison of two models (SLIP and SimCLR), which keep all of these attributes the same aside from input modality. Using this approach, we identify a sizable number of neural sites (on average 141 out of 1090 total sites or 12.94%) and brain regions where multimodal integration seems to occur. Additionally, we find that among the variants of multimodal training techniques we assess, CLIP-style training is the best suited for downstream prediction of the neural activity in these sites. Vighnesh Subramaniam, Colin Conwell, Christopher Wang, Gabriel Kreiman, Boris Katz, Ignacio Cases, Andrei Barbu |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Brain Treebank: Large-scale intracranial recordings from naturalistic language stimuliabstractWe present the Brain Treebank, a large-scale dataset of electrophysiological neural responses, recorded from intracranial probes while 10 subjects watched one or more Hollywood movies. Subjects watched on average 2.6 Hollywood movies, for an average viewing time of 4.3 hours, and a total of 43 hours. The audio track for each movie was transcribed with manual corrections. Word onsets were manually annotated on spectrograms of the audio track for each movie. Each transcript was automatically parsed and manually corrected into the universal dependencies (UD) formalism, assigning a part of speech to every word and a dependency parse to every sentence. In total, subjects heard over 38,000 sentences (223,000 words), while they had on average 168 electrodes implanted. This is the largest dataset of intracranial recordings featuring grounded naturalistic language, one of the largest English UD treebanks in general, and one of only a few UD treebanks aligned to multimodal features. We hope that this dataset serves as a bridge between linguistic concepts, perception, and their neural representations. To that end, we present an analysis of which electrodes are sensitive to language features while also mapping out a rough time course of language processing across these electrodes. The Brain Treebank is available at https://BrainTreebank.dev/ Christopher Wang, Adam Uri Yaari, Aaditya Singh, Vighnesh Subramaniam, Dana Rosenfarb, Jan DeWitt, Pranav Misra, Joseph R. Madsen, Scellig S. Stone, Gabriel Kreiman, Boris Katz, Ignacio Cases, Andrei Barbu |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2023 | BrainBERT: Self-supervised representation learning for intracranial recordings
Christopher Wang, Vighnesh Subramaniam, Adam Uri Yaari, Gabriel Kreiman, Boris Katz, Ignacio Cases, Andrei Barbu |
ICLR | 2 |