Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Federico Pavone
dblp:341/7268
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 77% Information retrieval · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | FairJob: A Real-World Dataset for Fairness in Online Systems · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › ranking fairness
recommendation fairness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | FairJob: A Real-World Dataset for Fairness in Online Systems · NeurIPS 2024 |
Recommender systems › domain-specific recommendation
job recommendation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | FairJob: A Real-World Dataset for Fairness in Online Systems · NeurIPS 2024 |
Information retrieval
online advertising |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | FairJob: A Real-World Dataset for Fairness in Online Systems · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
proxy estimation · 1.5bias mitigation · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | FairJob: A Real-World Dataset for Fairness in Online SystemsabstractWe introduce a fairness-aware dataset for job recommendation in advertising, designed to foster research in algorithmic fairness within real-world scenarios. It was collected and prepared to comply with privacy standards and business confidentiality. An additional challenge is the lack of access to protected user attributes such as gender, for which we propose a pragmatic solution to obtain a proxy estimate. Despite being anonymized and including a proxy for a sensitive attribute, our dataset preserves predictive power and maintains a realistic and challenging benchmark. This dataset addresses a significant gap in the availability of fairness-focused resources for high-impact domains like advertising -- the actual impact being having access or not to precious employment opportunities, where balancing fairness and utility is a common industrial challenge. We also explore various stages in the advertising process where unfairness can occur and introduce a method to compute a fair utility metric for the job recommendations in online systems case from a biased dataset. Experimental evaluations of bias mitigation techniques on the released dataset demonstrate potential improvements in fairness and the associated trade-offs with utility.The dataset is hosted at https://huggingface.co/datasets/criteo/FairJob. Source code for the experiments is hosted at https://github.com/criteo-research/FairJob-dataset/. Mariia Vladimirova, Federico Pavone, Eustache Diemert |
NeurIPS | 2 |