Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Federico Pavone

dblp:341/7268 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 77% Information retrieval · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.812024
FairJob: A Real-World Dataset for Fairness in Online Systems · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › ranking fairness
recommendation fairness
0.812024
FairJob: A Real-World Dataset for Fairness in Online Systems · NeurIPS 2024
Recommender systems › domain-specific recommendation
job recommendation
0.812024
FairJob: A Real-World Dataset for Fairness in Online Systems · NeurIPS 2024
Information retrieval
online advertising
0.212024
FairJob: A Real-World Dataset for Fairness in Online Systems · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

proxy estimation · 1.5bias mitigation · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 FairJob: A Real-World Dataset for Fairness in Online Systems
abstract
We introduce a fairness-aware dataset for job recommendation in advertising, designed to foster research in algorithmic fairness within real-world scenarios. It was collected and prepared to comply with privacy standards and business confidentiality. An additional challenge is the lack of access to protected user attributes such as gender, for which we propose a pragmatic solution to obtain a proxy estimate. Despite being anonymized and including a proxy for a sensitive attribute, our dataset preserves predictive power and maintains a realistic and challenging benchmark. This dataset addresses a significant gap in the availability of fairness-focused resources for high-impact domains like advertising -- the actual impact being having access or not to precious employment opportunities, where balancing fairness and utility is a common industrial challenge. We also explore various stages in the advertising process where unfairness can occur and introduce a method to compute a fair utility metric for the job recommendations in online systems case from a biased dataset. Experimental evaluations of bias mitigation techniques on the released dataset demonstrate potential improvements in fairness and the associated trade-offs with utility.The dataset is hosted at https://huggingface.co/datasets/criteo/FairJob. Source code for the experiments is hosted at https://github.com/criteo-research/FairJob-dataset/.
Mariia Vladimirova, Federico Pavone, Eustache Diemert
NeurIPS2