Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Egor Chistov

dblp:342/3612 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0004-6156-195XORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 67% Efficient and distributed learning · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
memory-efficient training
0.912025
MEMFOF: High-Resolution Training for Memory-Efficient Multi-Frame Optical Flow Estimation · ICCV 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation › optical flow
multi-frame optical flow
0.912025
MEMFOF: High-Resolution Training for Memory-Efficient Multi-Frame Optical Flow Estimation · ICCV 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
optical flow
0.912025
MEMFOF: High-Resolution Training for Memory-Efficient Multi-Frame Optical Flow Estimation · ICCV 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

high-resolution training · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 MEMFOF: High-Resolution Training for Memory-Efficient Multi-Frame Optical Flow Estimation
Vladislav Bargatin, Egor Chistov, Alexander Yakovenko, Dmitriy S. Vatolin
ICCV2
2023 BASED: Benchmarking, Analysis, and Structural Estimation of Deblurring
abstract
This paper discusses the challenges of evaluating deblurring-methods quality and proposes a reduced-reference metric based on machine learning. Traditional quality-assessment metrics such as PSNR and SSIM are common for this task, but not only do they correlate poorly with subjective assessments, they also require ground-truth (GT) frames, which can be difficult to obtain in the case of deblurring. To develop and evaluate our metric, we created a new motion-blur dataset using a beam splitter. The setup captured various motion types using a static camera, as most scenes in existing datasets include blur due to camera motion. We also conducted two large subjective comparisons to aid in metric development. Our resulting metric requires no GT frames, and it correlates well with subjective human perception of blur.
Nikita Alutis, Egor Chistov, Mikhail Dremin, Dmitriy S. Vatolin
VCIP2