VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sebastian Towers
dblp:342/7308 · also Sebastian Rene Towers
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 80% Optimization for machine learning · 20% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ADIOS: Antibody Development via Opponent Shaping · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
opponent shaping |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ADIOS: Antibody Development via Opponent Shaping · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy mirror descent |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning mirror maps in policy mirror descent · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning mirror maps in policy mirror descent · ICLR 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
immunoinformatics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ADIOS: Antibody Development via Opponent Shaping · ICML 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
therapeutic antibody design |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ADIOS: Antibody Development via Opponent Shaping · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
viral evolution simulation · 1.7opponent shaping · 1.7meta-learning · 1.7mirror descent · 0.9evolutionary strategies · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Learning mirror maps in policy mirror descentabstractPolicy Mirror Descent (PMD) is a popular framework in reinforcement learning, serving as a unifying perspective that encompasses numerous algorithms. These algorithms are derived through the selection of a mirror map and enjoy finite-time convergence guarantees. Despite its popularity, the exploration of PMD's full potential is limited, with the majority of research focusing on a particular mirror map---namely, the negative entropy---which gives rise to the renowned Natural Policy Gradient (NPG) method. It remains uncertain from existing theoretical studies whether the choice of mirror map significantly influences PMD's efficacy. In our work, we conduct empirical investigations to show that the conventional mirror map choice (NPG) often yields less-than-optimal outcomes across several standard benchmark environments. Using evolutionary strategies, we identify more efficient mirror maps that enhance the performance of PMD. We first focus on a tabular environment, i.e.\ Grid-World, where we relate existing theoretical bounds with the performance of PMD for a few standard mirror maps and the learned one. We then show that it is possible to learn a mirror map that outperforms the negative entropy in more complex environments, such as the MinAtar suite. Additionally, we demonstrate that the learned mirror maps generalize effectively to different tasks by testing each map across various other environments. Carlo Alfano, Sebastian Towers, Silvia Sapora, Chris Lu 0001, Patrick Rebeschini |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | ADIOS: Antibody Development via Opponent ShapingabstractAnti-viral therapies are typically designed to target only the current strains of a virus, a myopic response. However, therapy-induced selective pressures drive the emergence of new viral strains, against which the original myopic therapies are no longer effective. This evolutionary response presents an opportunity: our therapies could both defend against and actively influence viral evolution. This motivates our method ADIOS: Antibody Development vIa Opponent Shaping. ADIOS is a meta-learning framework where the process of antibody therapy design, the outer loop, accounts for the virus’s adaptive response, the inner loop. With ADIOS, antibodies are not only robust against potential future variants, they also influence, i.e. shape, which future variants emerge. In line with the opponent shaping literature, we refer to our optimised antibodies as shapers. To demonstrate the value of ADIOS, we build a viral evolution simulator using the Absolut! framework, in which shapers successfully target both current and future viral variants, outperforming myopic antibodies. Furthermore, we show that shapers modify the distribution over viral evolutionary trajectories to result in weaker variants. We believe that our ADIOS paradigm will facilitate the discovery of long-lived vaccines and antibody therapies while also generalising to other domains. Specifically, domains such as antimicrobial resistance, cancer treatment, and others with evolutionarily adaptive opponents. Our code is available at https://github.com/olakalisz/adios. Sebastian Towers, Aleksandra Kalisz, Philippe A. Robert, Alicia Higueruelo, Francesca V. Vianello, Ming-Han Chloe Tsai, Harrison Steel, Jakob N. Foerster |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Optimisation strategies for directed evolution without sequencingabstractDirected evolution can enable engineering of biological systems with minimal knowledge of their underlying sequence-to-function relationships. A typical directed evolution process consists of iterative rounds of mutagenesis and selection that are designed to steer changes in a biological system (e.g. a protein) towards some functional goal. Much work has been done, particularly leveraging advancements in machine learning, to optimise the process of directed evolution. Many of these methods, however, require DNA sequencing and synthesis, making them resource-intensive and incompatible with developments in targeted in vivo mutagenesis. Operating within the experimental constraints of established sorting-based directed evolution techniques (e.g. Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting, FACS), we explore approaches for optimisation of directed evolution that could in future be implemented without sequencing information. We then expand our methods to the context of emerging experimental techniques in directed evolution, which allow for single-cell selection based on fitness objectives defined from any combination of measurable traits. Finally, we explore these alternative strategies on the GB1 and TrpB empirical landscapes, demonstrating that they could lead to up to 19-fold and 7-fold increases respectively in the probability of attaining the global fitness peak. Jessica James, Sebastian Towers, Jakob N. Foerster, Harrison Steel |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 2 |