Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yuelyu Ji

dblp:342/8019 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-6389-5823ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › reranking
document re-ranking
0.912025
Reason-to-Rank: Distilling Direct and Comparative Reasoning from Large Language Models for Document Reranking · SIGIR 2025
Information retrieval › ranking › ranking model
interpretable ranking
0.912025
Reason-to-Rank: Distilling Direct and Comparative Reasoning from Large Language Models for Document Reranking · SIGIR 2025
Information retrieval
ranking
0.912025
Reason-to-Rank: Distilling Direct and Comparative Reasoning from Large Language Models for Document Reranking · SIGIR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model prompting · 0.9knowledge distillation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Reason-to-Rank: Distilling Direct and Comparative Reasoning from Large Language Models for Document Reranking
abstract
Reranking documents in information retrieval often relies on black-box models that improve effectiveness but lack explainability. We introduce Reason-to-Rank (R2R), a novel framework that separates direct relevance reasoning from comparison reasoning to provide both direct and comparitive explanations. We first prompt a large language model to produce comprehensive rationales and a ranking order; then we distill both the ranking decisions and textual explanations into a smaller, open-source student model. Our approach not only improves retrieval performance, as demonstrated in MSMARCO, BEIR, and BRIGHT, but also provides interpretable justifications for why one document outranks another. We report NDCG@5 (and NDCG@10) for direct comparisons with prior work, and show that the distilled student model achieves competitive results while significantly reducing computational overhead. By unifying direct and comparative reasoning in a single pipeline, R2R bridges the gap between transparency and effectiveness in modern reranking systems.
Yuelyu Ji, Zhuochun Li, Daqing He
SIGIR1
2023 Mapping dementia caregivers' comments on social media with evidence-based care strategies for memory loss and confusion
abstract
Dementia caregivers widely turn to social media for much needed information and support. Prior research on caregivers’ online information exchange has focused on the original questions or posts, without including peer comments in response to those original questions, which does not provide a complete picture of online information exchanges between caregivers and their peers. This paper provides a preliminary analysis of a subset of data from a larger project and suggests how peer comments might match with evidence-based care strategies for memory loss and confusion. A total of 954 peer comments on 114 Reddit posts for dementia memory loss and confusion were collected and mapped with 5 evidence-based strategies generated from 17 care strategies from 3 credible websites. Our results report how well peer comments on Reddit can map to existing evidence-based strategies, and provide preliminary evidence supporting the necessity of providing tailored information based on the patient’s characteristics, stages of disease, and the progression level of memory loss and confusion.
Ning Zou, Yuelyu Ji, Bo Xie 0001, Daqing He, Zhimeng Luo
CHIIR2