Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amin Parchami-Araghi

dblp:342/9400 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-0424-7812ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 83% Efficient and distributed learning · 13% Image recognition and object detection · 3%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
1.832025
FaCT: Faithful Concept Traces for Explaining Neural Network Decisions · NeurIPS 2025
Studying How to Efficiently and Effectively Guide Models with Explanations · ICCV 2023
Good Teachers Explain: Explanation-Enhanced Knowledge Distillation · ECCV (73) 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
concept-based explanation
0.912025
FaCT: Faithful Concept Traces for Explaining Neural Network Decisions · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explanation evaluation
explanation faithfulness
0.912025
FaCT: Faithful Concept Traces for Explaining Neural Network Decisions · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation
0.812024
Good Teachers Explain: Explanation-Enhanced Knowledge Distillation · ECCV (73) 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.712023
Studying How to Efficiently and Effectively Guide Models with Explanations · ICCV 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › distribution shift
robustness to distribution shift
0.712023
Studying How to Efficiently and Effectively Guide Models with Explanations · ICCV 2023
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection
0.212023
Studying How to Efficiently and Effectively Guide Models with Explanations · ICCV 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

foundation model · 0.9concept-consistency metric · 0.9knowledge distillation · 0.8energy loss · 0.7bounding box annotation · 0.7attribution methods · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 FaCT: Faithful Concept Traces for Explaining Neural Network Decisions
abstract
Deep networks have shown remarkable performance across a wide range of tasks, yet getting a global concept-level understanding of how they function remains a key challenge. Many post-hoc concept-based approaches have been introduced to understand their workings, yet they are not always faithful to the model. Further, they make restrictive assumptions on the concepts a model learns, such as class-specificity, small spatial extent, or alignment to human expectations. In this work, we put emphasis on the faithfulness of such concept-based explanations and propose a new model with model-inherent mechanistic concept-explanations. Our concepts are shared across classes and, from any layer, their contribution to the logit and their input-visualization can be faithfully traced. We also leverage foundation models to propose a new concept-consistency metric, C$^2$-Score, that can be used to evaluate concept-based methods. We show that, compared to prior work, our concepts are quantitatively more consistent and users find our concepts to be more interpretable, all while retaining competitive ImageNet performance.
Amin Parchami-Araghi, Sukrut Rao, Jonas Fischer, Bernt Schiele
NeurIPS1
2024 Good Teachers Explain: Explanation-Enhanced Knowledge Distillation
Amin Parchami-Araghi, Moritz Böhle, Sukrut Rao, Bernt Schiele
ECCV (73)1
2023 Studying How to Efficiently and Effectively Guide Models with Explanations
abstract
Despite being highly performant, deep neural networks might base their decisions on features that spuriously correlate with the provided labels, thus hurting generalization. To mitigate this, ‘model guidance’ has recently gained popularity, i.e. the idea of regularizing the models’ explanations to ensure that they are "right for the right reasons" [49]. While various techniques to achieve such model guidance have been proposed, experimental validation of these approaches has thus far been limited to relatively simple and / or synthetic datasets. To better understand the effectiveness of the various design choices that have been explored in the context of model guidance, in this work we conduct an in-depth evaluation across various loss functions, attribution methods, models, and ‘guidance depths’ on the PASCAL VOC 2007 and MS COCO 2014 datasets. As annotation costs for model guidance can limit its applicability, we also place a particular focus on efficiency. Specifically, we guide the models via bounding box annotations, which are much cheaper to obtain than the commonly used segmentation masks, and evaluate the robustness of model guidance under limited (e.g. with only 1% of annotated images) or overly coarse annotations. Further, we propose using the EPG score as an additional evaluation metric and loss function (‘Energy loss’). We show that optimizing for the Energy loss leads to models that exhibit a distinct focus on object-specific features, despite only using bounding box annotations that also include background regions. Lastly, we show that such model guidance can improve generalization under distribution shifts. Code available at: https://github.com/sukrutrao/Model-Guidance
Sukrut Rao, Moritz Böhle, Amin Parchami-Araghi, Bernt Schiele
ICCV3