Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yinjie Li

dblp:342/9401 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 93% High-performance computing · 7%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.712023
The SLAM Hive Benchmarking Suite · ICRA 2023
Performance modeling and evaluation
parameter space exploration
0.712023
The SLAM Hive Benchmarking Suite · ICRA 2023
Performance modeling and evaluation › benchmarking
SLAM benchmarking
0.712023
The SLAM Hive Benchmarking Suite · ICRA 2023
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization
0.712023
The SLAM Hive Benchmarking Suite · ICRA 2023
High-performance computing
cluster computing
0.212023
The SLAM Hive Benchmarking Suite · ICRA 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

containerization · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 The SLAM Hive Benchmarking Suite
abstract
Benchmarking Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) algorithms is important to scientists and users of robotic systems alike. But through their many configuration options in hardware and software, SLAM systems feature a vast parameter space that scientists up to now were not able to explore. The proposed SLAM Hive Benchmarking Suite is able to analyze SLAM algorithms in 1000's of mapping runs, through its utilization of container technology and deployment in a cluster. This paper presents the architecture and open source implementation of SLAM Hive and compares it to existing efforts on SLAM evaluation. Furthermore, we highlight the function of SLAM Hive by exploring some open source algorithms on public datasets in terms of accuracy. We compare the algorithms against each other and evaluate how parameters effect not only accuracy but also CPU and memory usage. Through this we show that SLAM Hive can become an essential tool for proper comparisons and evaluations of SLAM algorithms and thus drive the scientific development in the research on SLAM.
Yinjie Li, Sören Schwertfeger
ICRA3