Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Junyeol Yu

dblp:343/5351 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0004-4481-1507ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Energy-efficient computing · 46% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 23% Cloud and datacenter computing · 23%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cloud and datacenter computing › cluster resource management and scheduling
cluster resource management
0.712023
Know Your Enemy To Save Cloud Energy: Energy-Performance Characterization of Machine Learning Serving · HPCA 2023
Energy-efficient computing
energy-aware scheduling
0.712023
Know Your Enemy To Save Cloud Energy: Energy-Performance Characterization of Machine Learning Serving · HPCA 2023
GPUs and heterogeneous computing
GPU power management
0.712023
Know Your Enemy To Save Cloud Energy: Energy-Performance Characterization of Machine Learning Serving · HPCA 2023
Energy-efficient computing
power management
0.712023
Know Your Enemy To Save Cloud Energy: Energy-Performance Characterization of Machine Learning Serving · HPCA 2023
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization
0.212023
Know Your Enemy To Save Cloud Energy: Energy-Performance Characterization of Machine Learning Serving · HPCA 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

dynamic voltage and frequency scaling · 0.7cloud-scale simulation · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Cloud Reamer: Enabling Inference Services in Training Clusters
abstract
CPU cores in GPU servers are often underutilized during DNN training. Co-locating CPU-based inference tasks with DNN training offers an opportunity to utilize these idle CPU cycles. However, three technical challenges must be addressed: avoiding disruption to training workloads, meeting different performance requirements for online and offline inference, and swiftly adjusting inference configurations based on available resources. This paper proposes Cloud Reamer, a scheme to colocate training and inference tasks on GPU servers, optimizing unused CPU cycles without disrupting training. Cloud Reamer prioritizes training tasks to minimize interference. For online inference, it allocates cores to ensure predictable performance, while for offline inference, it uses all available cores to maximize throughput. Cloud Reamer enhances online and offline inference performance by dynamically adjusting configurations based on surplus CPU resources. Evaluations show that Cloud Reamer improves inference throughput with minimal impact on training, maintaining training interference below $\mathbf{3. 2 \%}$. It meets latency requirements for 46% more requests for online inference and achieves a 61x throughput increase for offline inference compared to conventional methods.
Gwanjong Park, Junyeol Yu, Euiseong Seo
MASCOTS3
2023 Know Your Enemy To Save Cloud Energy: Energy-Performance Characterization of Machine Learning Serving
abstract
The proportion of machine learning (ML) inference in modern cloud workloads is rapidly increasing, and graphic processing units (GPUs) are the most preferred computational accelerators for it. The massively parallel computing capability of GPUs is well-suited to the inference workloads but consumes more power than conventional CPUs. Therefore, GPU servers contribute significantly to the total power consumption of a data center. However, despite their heavy power consumption, GPU power management in cloud-scale has not yet been actively researched. In this paper, we reveal three findings about energy efficiency of ML inference clusters in the cloud. ❶ GPUs of different architectures have comparative advantages in energy efficiency to each other for a set of ML models. ❷ The energy efficiency of a GPU set may significantly vary depending on the number of active GPUs and their clock frequencies even when producing the same level of throughput. ❸ The service level objective(SLO)-blind dynamic voltage and frequency scaling (DVFS) driver of commercial GPUs maintain an immoderately high clock frequency. Based on these implications, we propose a hierarchical GPU resource management approach for cloud-scale inference services. The proposed approach consists of energy-aware cluster allocation, intra-cluster node scaling, intra-node GPU scaling and GPU clock scaling schemes considering the inference service architecture hierarchy. We evaluated our approach with its prototype implementation and cloud-scale simulation. The evaluation with real-world traces showed that the proposed schemes can save up to 28.3% of the cloud-scale energy consumption when serving five ML models with 105 servers having three different kinds of GPUs.
Junyeol Yu, Euiseong Seo
HPCA1