VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gianna Leoni
dblp:343/5468
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 77% Language models and text generation · 23% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
low-resource NLP |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Fit for our purpose, not yours: Benchmark for a low-resource, Indigenous language · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computing education › broadening participation in computing
culturally responsive computing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Fit for our purpose, not yours: Benchmark for a low-resource, Indigenous language · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models
benchmark construction |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Fit for our purpose, not yours: Benchmark for a low-resource, Indigenous language · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
dataset construction · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | A review on speech emotion recognition for low-resource and Indigenous languagesabstractSpeech emotion recognition (SER) is an emerging field in human–computer interaction. Although numerous studies have focused on SER for well-resourced languages, the literature reveals a significant gap in research on low-resource and Indigenous (LRI) languages. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the existing literature on SER in the context of LRI languages, analysing critical factors to consider at each stage of designing an SER system. The review indicates that most studies on SER for LRI languages adopt emotion categories established for well-resourced languages, often assuming the universality of emotions. However, the literature suggests that this approach may be limited due to emotional disparities influenced by cultural variations. Additionally, the review underscores that current SER systems typically lack community-oriented methodologies in the development of technology for LRI languages. The importance of feature selection is highlighted, with evidence suggesting that a combination of traditional machine learning methods and carefully selected acoustic features may offer viable options for SER in these languages. Furthermore, the review identifies a need for further exploration of semi-supervised and unsupervised approaches to enhance SER capabilities in LRI contexts. Overall, current SER systems for LRI languages lag behind state-of-the-art standards due to the lack of resources, indicating that there is still much work to be done in this area. Himashi Rathnayake, Jesin James, Gianna Leoni, Ake Nicholas, Catherine I. Watson, Peter Keegan |
Speech Commun. | 3 |
| 2024 | Fit for our purpose, not yours: Benchmark for a low-resource, Indigenous languageabstractInfluential and popular benchmarks in AI are largely irrelevant to developing NLP tools for low-resource, Indigenous languages. With the primary goal of measuring the performance of general-purpose AI systems, these benchmarks fail to give due consideration and care to individual language communities, especially low-resource languages. The datasets contain numerous grammatical and orthographic errors, poor pronunciation, limited vocabulary, and the content lacks cultural relevance to the language community. To overcome the issues with these benchmarks, we have created a dataset for te reo Māori (the Indigenous language of Aotearoa/New Zealand) to pursue NLP tools that are ‘fit-for-our-purpose’. This paper demonstrates how low-resourced, Indigenous languages can develop tailored, high-quality benchmarks that; i. Consider the impact of colonisation on their language; ii. Reflect the diversity of speakers in the language community; iii. Support the aspirations for the tools they are developing and their language revitalisation efforts. Suzanne Duncan, Gianna Leoni, Lee Steven, Keoni Mahelona, Peter-Lucas Jones |
NeurIPS | 2 |