Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Gianna Leoni

dblp:343/5468 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 77% Language models and text generation · 23%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
low-resource NLP
0.812024
Fit for our purpose, not yours: Benchmark for a low-resource, Indigenous language · NeurIPS 2024
Computing education › broadening participation in computing
culturally responsive computing
0.812024
Fit for our purpose, not yours: Benchmark for a low-resource, Indigenous language · NeurIPS 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models
benchmark construction
0.212024
Fit for our purpose, not yours: Benchmark for a low-resource, Indigenous language · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

dataset construction · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 A review on speech emotion recognition for low-resource and Indigenous languages
abstract
Speech emotion recognition (SER) is an emerging field in human–computer interaction. Although numerous studies have focused on SER for well-resourced languages, the literature reveals a significant gap in research on low-resource and Indigenous (LRI) languages. This paper presents a comprehensive review of the existing literature on SER in the context of LRI languages, analysing critical factors to consider at each stage of designing an SER system. The review indicates that most studies on SER for LRI languages adopt emotion categories established for well-resourced languages, often assuming the universality of emotions. However, the literature suggests that this approach may be limited due to emotional disparities influenced by cultural variations. Additionally, the review underscores that current SER systems typically lack community-oriented methodologies in the development of technology for LRI languages. The importance of feature selection is highlighted, with evidence suggesting that a combination of traditional machine learning methods and carefully selected acoustic features may offer viable options for SER in these languages. Furthermore, the review identifies a need for further exploration of semi-supervised and unsupervised approaches to enhance SER capabilities in LRI contexts. Overall, current SER systems for LRI languages lag behind state-of-the-art standards due to the lack of resources, indicating that there is still much work to be done in this area.
Himashi Rathnayake, Jesin James, Gianna Leoni, Ake Nicholas, Catherine I. Watson, Peter Keegan
Speech Commun.3
2024 Fit for our purpose, not yours: Benchmark for a low-resource, Indigenous language
abstract
Influential and popular benchmarks in AI are largely irrelevant to developing NLP tools for low-resource, Indigenous languages. With the primary goal of measuring the performance of general-purpose AI systems, these benchmarks fail to give due consideration and care to individual language communities, especially low-resource languages. The datasets contain numerous grammatical and orthographic errors, poor pronunciation, limited vocabulary, and the content lacks cultural relevance to the language community. To overcome the issues with these benchmarks, we have created a dataset for te reo Māori (the Indigenous language of Aotearoa/New Zealand) to pursue NLP tools that are ‘fit-for-our-purpose’. This paper demonstrates how low-resourced, Indigenous languages can develop tailored, high-quality benchmarks that; i. Consider the impact of colonisation on their language; ii. Reflect the diversity of speakers in the language community; iii. Support the aspirations for the tools they are developing and their language revitalisation efforts.
Suzanne Duncan, Gianna Leoni, Lee Steven, Keoni Mahelona, Peter-Lucas Jones
NeurIPS2