Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Junning Ze
dblp:343/8521
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0005-4799-1555ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 64% Biometric security · 36% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Speech recognition and synthesis · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 50% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Understanding and Benchmarking the Commonality of Adversarial Examples · SP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
automatic speech recognition |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Understanding and Benchmarking the Commonality of Adversarial Examples · SP 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial example |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Understanding and Benchmarking the Commonality of Adversarial Examples · SP 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial example
audio adversarial example |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Understanding and Benchmarking the Commonality of Adversarial Examples · SP 2024 |
Biometric security
speaker recognition |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Scoring Metrics of Assessing Voiceprint Distinctiveness Based on Speech Content and Rate · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial defense
adversarial attack detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Understanding and Benchmarking the Commonality of Adversarial Examples · SP 2024 |
Biometric security
speaker verification |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Scoring Metrics of Assessing Voiceprint Distinctiveness Based on Speech Content and Rate · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical analysis · 1.5adversarial example detection · 1.5acoustic feature analysis · 1.5statistical correlation analysis · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Understanding and Benchmarking the Commonality of Adversarial ExamplesabstractSpeech recognition system converts audio into texts by utilizing deep learning algorithms. Numerous works have demonstrated various adversarial example (AE) attacks, i.e., adding carefully-crafted noises can trick the speech recognition system into outputting completely incorrect texts. This paper aims to reveal the distinctive properties of adversarial audio in terms of phonetics. We believe analyzing the distinctive properties is critical in understanding adversarial attacks on ASR models, as well as guiding the generation and defense of AEs. Thus, we aim to answer three questions: (1) What are the distinctive properties of adversarial audio that are common to diverse attacks? (2) How to quantify these distinctive properties? (3) How can we use these properties to improve the security of ASR models? To answer these questions, we perform a large-scale measurement based on acoustic features and statistical analysis. By measuring a total of 612,000 acoustic-statistical feature vectors for 2,400 audio samples, we obtain four insights on the distinctive properties, i.e., filling energy gap, speech-like morphology, disordered signal, and abnormal linguistic pattern. Based on these properties, we design a naturalness score to assess the stealthiness of attacks and propose an adversarial example detector with an average accuracy of 91.1%. He Ruiwen, Yushi Cheng, Junning Ze, Xiaoyu Ji 0001, Wenyuan Xu 0001 |
SP | 3 |
| 2024 | Enrollment-Stage Backdoor Attacks on Speaker Recognition Systems via Adversarial UltrasoundabstractAutomatic Speaker Recognition Systems (SRSs) have been widely used in voice applications for personal identification and access control. A typical SRS consists of three stages, i.e., training, enrollment, and recognition. Previous work has revealed that SRSs can be bypassed by backdoor attacks at the training stage or by adversarial example attacks at the recognition stage. In this paper, we propose TUNER, a new type of backdoor attack against the enrollment stage of SRS via adversarial ultrasound modulation, which is inaudible, synchronization-free, content-independent, and black-box. Our key idea is to first inject the backdoor into the SRS with modulated ultrasound when a legitimate user initiates the enrollment, and afterward, the polluted SRS will grant access to both the legitimate user and the adversary with high confidence. Our attack faces a major challenge of unpredictable user articulation at the enrollment stage. To overcome this challenge, we generate the ultrasonic backdoor by augmenting the optimization process with random speech content, vocalizing time, and volume of the user. Furthermore, to achieve real-world robustness, we improve the ultrasonic signal over traditional methods using sparse frequency points, pre-compensation, and single-sideband (SSB) modulation. We extensively evaluate TUNER on two common datasets and seven representative SRS models, as well as its robustness against seven kinds of defenses. Results show that our attack can successfully bypass speaker recognition systems while remaining effective to various speakers, speech content, etc. To mitigate this newly discovered threat, we also provide discussions on potential countermeasures, limitations, and future works of this new threat. Xinfeng Li, Junning Ze, Chen Yan 0001, Yushi Cheng, Xiaoyu Ji 0001, Wenyuan Xu 0001 |
IEEE Internet Things J. | 2 |
| 2024 | Scoring Metrics of Assessing Voiceprint Distinctiveness Based on Speech Content and RateabstractA voiceprint is the distinctive pattern of human voices widely used for authentication in voice assistants. This paper investigates the impact of speech contents and speech rates on the distinctiveness of voiceprint, and has obtained answers to three questions by studying 2457 speakers and 21,500,000 test samples: 1) What are the influential factors that users can control to affect the distinctiveness of voiceprints? 2) How to quantify the distinctiveness for given speeches, e.g., the speech of wake-up words when activating voice assistants? 3) How to help users select wake-up words and adjust the speech rate to improve distinctiveness levels? To answer those questions, we break down speeches into phones, and experimentally obtain the correlation between false recognition rates and the richness, order, length, and elements of the phones. Then, we define the PROLE Score that can reflect the voice distinctiveness, and evaluate 30 wake-up words of 19 commercial voice assistant products to provide recommendations on selecting secure voiceprint words. We also measure the correlation between false recognition rates and speech rates, and define the TER Score that reveals the distance of distinctiveness from the secure voiceprint, and it guides users to adjust their speech rate to a secure value. He Ruiwen, Yushi Cheng, Junning Ze, Xinfeng Li, Xiaoyu Ji 0001, Wenyuan Xu 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. | 3 |
| 2022 | UltraBD: Backdoor Attack against Automatic Speaker Verification Systems via Adversarial UltrasoundabstractAutomatic speaker verification (ASV) systems have been widely applied in voice user interfaces to conduct person identification and access control via voiceprints. A typical ASV system consists of three stages, i.e., training, enrollment, and verification. Previous work has revealed that the ASV system can be bypassed at the training stage by backdoor attacks and at the verification stage by adversarial example attacks. In this paper, we propose a new type of backdoor attack aimed at the enrollment stage via adversarial ultrasound, named UltraBD, which is highly imperceptible, synchronization-free, and content-independent. By simultaneously injecting the ultrasound backdoor examples when the legitimate user initiates the enrollment, the polluted voiceprints stored in the ASV systems grant access to both the legitimate user and the adversary with relatively high confidence. Despite the challenges, i.e., when, what, and how the legitimate user articulates at the enrollment stage can be remarkably unpredictable and various, we managed to launch UltraBD by augmenting the generation and optimization process of the ultrasound backdoor examples with the randomness of synchronous time and relative amplitude ratio. Furthermore, we optimize the modulation mechanism of adversarial ultrasound by tuning the baseband signal on limited signal frequency points to improve its robustness in the physical world setting. We validate UltraBD on two common datasets together with two open-source ASV models. Results show that UltraBD can be robust to various configurations, e.g., different speakers and utterance content. In sum, our attack calls attention to a new attack surface of ASV systems and sheds light on its fundamental mechanisms. Junning Ze, Xinfeng Li, Yushi Cheng, Xiaoyu Ji 0001, Wenyuan Xu 0001 |
ICPADS | 1 |