Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander Mehta

dblp:344/1526 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation
0.912025
Free-Running vs. Synchronous: Single-Photon Lidar for High-Flux 3D Imaging · ICCV 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
maximum likelihood estimation
0.912025
Free-Running vs. Synchronous: Single-Photon Lidar for High-Flux 3D Imaging · ICCV 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regularization · 0.9maximum likelihood estimation · 0.9learned point cloud score model · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Free-Running vs. Synchronous: Single-Photon Lidar for High-Flux 3D Imaging
abstract
Conventional wisdom suggests that single-photon lidar (SPL) should operate in low-light conditions to minimize dead-time effects. Many methods have been developed to mitigate these effects in synchronous SPL systems. However, solutions for free-running SPL remain limited despite the advantage of reduced histogram distortion from dead times. To improve the accuracy of free-running SPL, we propose a computationally efficient joint maximum likelihood estimator of the signal flux, the background flux, and the depth using only histograms, along with a complementary regularization framework that incorporates a learned point cloud score model as a prior. Simulations and experiments demonstrate that free-running SPL yields lower estimation errors than its synchronous counterpart under identical conditions, with our regularization further improving accuracy.
Ruangrawee Kitichotkul, Shashwath Bharadwaj, Joshua Rapp, Yanting Ma, Alexander Mehta, Vivek K. Goyal
ICCV5