Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Paul Bouchaud
dblp:344/2366
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-0310-8194ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Web and mobile security · 77% Privacy and data protection · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational social science and digital humanities › platform governance
content moderation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Beyond the Guidelines: Assessing Meta's Political Ad Moderation in the EU · IMC 2024 |
Computational social science and digital humanities
platform governance |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Beyond the Guidelines: Assessing Meta's Political Ad Moderation in the EU · IMC 2024 |
Web and mobile security
online advertising |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Beyond the Guidelines: Assessing Meta's Political Ad Moderation in the EU · IMC 2024 |
Privacy and data protection
regulatory compliance |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Beyond the Guidelines: Assessing Meta's Political Ad Moderation in the EU · IMC 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical estimation · 1.5dataset analysis · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Browsing Amazon's Book Bubbles
Paul Bouchaud |
ASONAM (2) | 1 |
| 2024 | A Dataset to Assess Microsoft Copilot Answers in the Context of Swiss, Bavarian and Hessian ElectionsabstractThis study describes a dataset that allows to assess the emerging challenges posed by Generative Artificial Intelligence when doing Active Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), especially when summarizing trustworthy sources on the Internet. As a case study, we focus on Microsoft Copilot, an innovative software that integrates Large Language Models (LLMs) and Search Engines (SE) making advanced AI accessible to the general public. The core contribution of this paper is the presentation of the largest public database to date of RAG responses to user prompts, collected during the 2023 electoral campaigns in Switzerland, Bavaria and Hesse. This dataset was compiled with the assistance of a group of experts who posed realistic voter questions and conducted fact-checking of Microsoft Copilot's responses. It contains prompts and answers in English, German, French and Italian. All the collection happened during the electoral campaign, between 21 August 2023 and 2 October 2023. The paper makes available the full set of 5,561 pairs of prompts and answers, including the URLs referenced in the answers. In addition to the dataset itself, we provide 1374 answers labelled by a group of experts who rated the accuracy of the answers in providing factual information, showing that almost one out of three times the chatbot responded with either factually incorrect information or completely nonsensical answers. This resource is intended to facilitate further research into the performance of LLMs in the context of elections, defined as a "high-risk scenario" by the Digital Services Act (DSA) Article 34(1)(c). Salvatore Romano, Riccardo Angius, Natalie Kerby, Paul Bouchaud, Jacopo Amidei, Andreas Kaltenbrunner |
ICWSM | 4 |
| 2024 | Beyond the Guidelines: Assessing Meta's Political Ad Moderation in the EUabstractThis study examines Meta's enforcement of its political advertising policies across 16 European Union countries. Leveraging a comprehensive dataset provided by Meta under the European Digital Services Act, encompassing all ads targeting EU countries, our analysis exposes shortcomings in Meta's ad moderation. In particular, over 60% of the ads moderated as political by Meta do not fall under Meta's guidelines. Also, we estimate that only 7.7% of undeclared political ads, i.e., political ads that are not declared as such by advertisers, undergo moderation by Meta. These results highlight substantial deficiencies in Meta's regulation of political advertisements, underscoring the need for enhanced measures to safeguard democratic discourse. Paul Bouchaud, Jean F. Liénard |
IMC | 1 |