Power consumption has become a limiting factor in all areas of computing. Hence, making the most of the available power budget is paramount. To use the available budget most efficiently, techniques like dynamic voltage and frequency scaling and idle states can be used. This work analyzes the instructions UMWAIT, TPAUSE, and MWAITX on three different systems. We analyze their instruction latencies, power consumptions, and dependencies on core frequencies. To do so, we introduce benchmarks to gather performance and power parameters, which can be used for future software optimizations. Key findings include: The expected sleep duration passed to UMWAIT and TPAUSE can influence the depth of the user idle state. The actual sleep duration of TPAUSE increases stepwise with an increasing expected sleep duration. Requesting a deeper idle state leads to an additional sleep duration, which increases with a lower core frequency. The core frequency influences the instruction latency of TPAUSE, where a low frequency can lead to an irregular performance pattern. The latency of TPAUSE, UMWAIT, and MWAITX is most often higher than requested on the evaluated systems. Core power consumption can be reduced by ~20% ~70% compared to the usage of PAUSE. The latency for waking a core in user idle reflects the underlying hardware architecture with tens (desktop architecture with shallow idle states) to hundreds (server architecture with deep idle states) of nanoseconds at nominal frequencies.

Dependable power measurements are the backbone of energy-efficient computing systems. The IBM PowerNV platform offers such power measurements through an embedded PowerPC 405 processor: The On-Chip Controller (OCC). Among other system-control tasks, the OCC provides power measurements for several domains, such as system, CPU, and GPU. This paper provides a detailed description and an in-depth evaluation of these OCC-provided power measurements. For that, we describe the provided interfaces themselves and experimentally verify their overhead (3.6 µs to 10.8 µs per access) and readout rate (24.95 Sa/s). We also study the consistency of the reported sensor readouts across the measurement domains and compare it to externally measured data. Furthermore, we estimate the internal sampling rate (1996 Sa/s) by provoking aliasing errors with artificial workloads, and quantify the errors that such aliasing could introduce in practice (for power consumption of processors 12% in our experimental worst-case scenario). Given these insights, practitioners using the IBM PowerNV platform can assess the quality of the embedded measurements, permitting sought-after energy efficiency improvements.