Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aryan Jain

dblp:344/3755 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 38% Motion planning and robot control · 19% Reinforcement learning · 19%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › offline reinforcement learning
offline policy learning
0.712023
Train Offline, Test Online: A Real Robot Learning Benchmark · ICRA 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training
pre-trained visual representation
0.712023
Where are we in the search for an Artificial Visual Cortex for Embodied Intelligence? · NeurIPS 2023
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning
0.712023
Train Offline, Test Online: A Real Robot Learning Benchmark · ICRA 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › model adaptation
task adaptation
0.712023
Where are we in the search for an Artificial Visual Cortex for Embodied Intelligence? · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
visual representation
0.712023
Where are we in the search for an Artificial Visual Cortex for Embodied Intelligence? · NeurIPS 2023
Robotics › Robot manipulation
manipulation benchmark
0.212023
Train Offline, Test Online: A Real Robot Learning Benchmark · ICRA 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

visual representation learning · 0.7vision transformer · 0.7offline policy learning · 0.7masked autoencoding · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Train Offline, Test Online: A Real Robot Learning Benchmark
abstract
Three challenges limit the progress of robot learning research: robots are expensive (few labs can participate), everyone uses different robots (findings do not generalize across labs), and we lack internet-scale robotics data. We take on these challenges via a new benchmark: Train Offline, Test Online (TOTO). TOTO provides remote users with access to shared robots for evaluating methods on common tasks and an open-source dataset of these tasks for offline training. Its manipulation task suite requires challenging generalization to unseen objects, positions, and lighting. We present initial results on TOTO comparing five pretrained visual representations and four offline policy learning baselines, remotely contributed by five institutions. The real promise of TOTO, however, lies in the future: we release the benchmark for additional submissions from any user, enabling easy, direct comparison to several methods without the need to obtain hardware or collect data.
Gaoyue Zhou, Victoria Dean, Mohan Kumar Srirama, Aravind Rajeswaran, Jyothish Pari, Kyle Hatch, Aryan Jain, Tianhe Yu, Pieter Abbeel, Lerrel Pinto, Chelsea Finn, Abhinav Gupta 0001
ICRA7
2023 Where are we in the search for an Artificial Visual Cortex for Embodied Intelligence?
abstract
We present the largest and most comprehensive empirical study of pre-trained visual representations (PVRs) or visual ‘foundation models’ for Embodied AI. First, we curate CortexBench, consisting of 17 different tasks spanning locomotion, navigation, dexterous, and mobile manipulation. Next, we systematically evaluate existing PVRs and find that none are universally dominant. To study the effect of pre-training data size and diversity, we combine over 4,000 hours of egocentric videos from 7 different sources (over 4.3M images) and ImageNet to train different-sized vision transformers using Masked Auto-Encoding (MAE) on slices of this data. Contrary to inferences from prior work, we find that scaling dataset size and diversity does not improve performance universally (but does so on average). Our largest model, named VC-1, outperforms all prior PVRs on average but does not universally dominate either. Next, we show that task- or domain-specific adaptation of VC-1 leads to substantial gains, with VC-1 (adapted) achieving competitive or superior performance than the best known results on all of the benchmarks in CortexBench. Finally, we present real-world hardware experiments, in which VC-1 and VC-1 (adapted) outperform the strongest pre-existing PVR. Overall, this paper presents no new techniques but a rigorous systematic evaluation, a broad set of findings about PVRs (that in some cases, refute those made in narrow domains in prior work), and open-sourced code and models (that required over 10,000 GPU-hours to train) for the benefit of the research community.
Arjun Majumdar, Karmesh Yadav, Sergio Arnaud, Yecheng Jason Ma 0001, Sneha Silwal, Aryan Jain, Vincent-Pierre Berges, Tingfan Wu, Jay Vakil, Pieter Abbeel, Jitendra Malik, Dhruv Batra, Oleksandr Maksymets, Aravind Rajeswaran, Franziska Meier
NeurIPS7