Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Théo Moutakanni

dblp:344/5453 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-2681-5169ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 68% Vision and language · 25% Efficient and distributed learning · 6%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
cross-modal alignment
0.912025
DINOv2 Meets Text: A Unified Framework for Image- and Pixel-Level Vision-Language Alignment · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › visual representation learning
vision foundation model
0.912025
DINOv2 Meets Text: A Unified Framework for Image- and Pixel-Level Vision-Language Alignment · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › embedding learning › joint embedding
joint embedding architecture
0.812024
You Don't Need Domain-Specific Data Augmentations When Scaling Self-Supervised Learning · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › efficient training
compute-constrained training
0.212024
You Don't Need Domain-Specific Data Augmentations When Scaling Self-Supervised Learning · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

contrastive learning · 1.6text encoder alignment · 0.9lit training · 0.9self-supervised learning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 DINOv2 Meets Text: A Unified Framework for Image- and Pixel-Level Vision-Language Alignment
abstract
Self-supervised visual foundation models produce powerful embeddings that achieve remarkable performance on a wide range of downstream tasks. However, unlike vision-language models such as CLIP [67], self-supervised visual features are not readily aligned with language, hindering their adoption in open-vocabulary tasks. Our method, named dino.txt, unlocks this new ability for DINOv2 [63], a widely used self-supervised visual encoder. We build upon the LiT training strategy [97], which trains a text encoder to align with a frozen vision model but leads to unsatisfactory results on dense tasks. We propose several key ingredients to improve performance on both global and dense tasks, such as concatenating the [CLS] token with the patch average to train the alignment and curating data using both text and image modalities. With these, we successfully train a CLIP-like model with only a fraction of the computational cost compared to CLIP while achieving state-of-the-art results in zero-shot classification and open-vocabulary semantic segmentation.
Cijo Jose, Théo Moutakanni, Dahyun Kang, Federico Baldassarre, Timothée Darcet, Hu Xu 0001, Daniel Li 0006, Marc Szafraniec, Michaël Ramamonjisoa, Maxime Oquab, Oriane Siméoni, Huy V. Vo, Patrick Labatut, Piotr Bojanowski
CVPR2
2025 Cell-DINO: Self-supervised image-based embeddings for cell fluorescent microscopy
abstract
Accurately quantifying cellular morphology at scale could substantially empower existing single-cell approaches. However, measuring cell morphology remains an active field of research, which has inspired multiple computer vision algorithms over the years. Here, we show that DINOv2, a vision-transformer based, self-supervised algorithm, has a remarkable ability for learning rich representations of cellular morphology without manual annotations or any other type of supervision. We apply DINOv2 to cell phenotyping problems, and compare the performance of resulting models, called Cell-DINO models, on a wide variety of tasks across two publicly available imaging datasets of diverse specifications and biological focus. Compared to supervised and other self-supervised baselines, Cell-DINO models demonstrate improved performance, especially in low annotation regimes. For instance, to classify protein localization using only 1% of annotations on a challenging single-cell dataset, Cell-DINO performs 70% better than a supervised strategy, and 24% better than another self-supervised alternative. The results show that Cell-DINO can support the study of unknown biological variation, including single-cell heterogeneity and relationships between experimental conditions, making it an excellent tool for image-based biological discovery.
Théo Moutakanni, Camille Couprie, Seung Eun Yi, Michael Doron, Zitong Sam Chen, Nikita Moshkov, Elouan Gardes, Mathilde Caron, Hugo Touvron, Armand Joulin, Piotr Bojanowski, Wolfgang Maximilian Anton Pernice, Juan C. Caicedo
PLoS Comput. Biol.1
2024 You Don't Need Domain-Specific Data Augmentations When Scaling Self-Supervised Learning
abstract
Self-Supervised learning (SSL) with Joint-Embedding Architectures (JEA) has led to outstanding performances. All instantiations of this paradigm were trained using strong and well-established hand-crafted data augmentations, leading to the general belief that they are required for the proper training and performance of such models. On the other hand, generative reconstruction-based models such as BEIT and MAE or Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures such as I-JEPA have shown strong performance without using data augmentations except masking. In this work, we challenge the importance of invariance and data-augmentation in JEAs at scale. By running a case-study on a recent SSL foundation model -- DINOv2 -- we show that strong image representations can be obtained with JEAs and only cropping without resizing provided the training data is large enough, reaching state-of-the-art results and using the least amount of augmentation in the literature. Through this study, we also discuss the impact of compute constraints on the outcomes of experimental deep learning research, showing that they can lead to very different conclusions.
Théo Moutakanni, Maxime Oquab, Marc Szafraniec, Maria Vakalopoulou, Piotr Bojanowski
NeurIPS1